* `security_scopes.scopes` will contain `["me"]` for the *path operation* `read_users_me`, because it is declared in the dependency `get_current_active_user`.
                            * `security_scopes.scopes` will contain `[]` (nothing) for the *path operation* `read_system_status`, because it didn't declare any `Security` with `scopes`, and its dependency, `get_current_user`, doesn't declare any `scopes` either.

/// tip

So, during that time, the computer can go and do some other work, while "slow-file" 📝 finishes.

Then the computer / program 🤖 will come back every time it has a chance because it's waiting again, or whenever it 🤖 finished all the work it had at that point. And it 🤖 will see if any of the tasks it was waiting for have already finished, doing whatever it had to do.

<img src="/img/tutorial/sub-applications/image02.png">

If you try interacting with any of the two user interfaces, they will work correctly, because the browser will be able to talk to each specific app or sub-app.

### Technical Details: `root_path` { #technical-details-root-path }

Because all the **fields actually change** (the type now includes `None` and they now have a default value of `None`), we need to **re-declare** them.

     *   <li>If this field's value == currentThread, we know that it's up to date, because write
     *       operations in a thread always happen-before subsequent read operations in the same
     *       thread
     *   <li>If this field's value == null because of unsafe publication, we know that it isn't the
     *       object associated with our thread, because if it was the publication wouldn't have been

          only-labels: "stat:awaiting response"
          stale-issue-message: > 
            This issue is stale because it has been open for 7 days with no activity.
            It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you.
          close-issue-message: >
            This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 7 days since being marked as stale.
            Please reopen if you'd like to work on this further.

    }

    @Override
    public List<String> getModelIds() {
        return modelIds;
    }

    public DefaultModelBuildingResult addModelId(String modelId) {
        // Intentionally notNull because Super POM may not contain a modelId
        Objects.requireNonNull(modelId, "modelId cannot null");

        modelIds.add(modelId);

        return this;
    }

    @Override
    public Model getRawModel() {

 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link
 * IteratorTester#newTargetIterator()} method. This is because it's impossible to test an Iterator
 * without changing its state, so the tester needs a steady supply of fresh Iterators.
 *
 * <p>If your iterator supports modification through {@code remove()}, you may wish to override the

      logger.finer(Platform.format("%s: including by default: %s", test, e.getMessage()));
      return true;
    }
    if (suppressedTests.contains(method)) {
      logger.finer(Platform.format("%s: excluding because it was explicitly suppressed.", test));
      return false;
    }
    TesterRequirements requirements;
    try {
      requirements = FeatureUtil.getTesterRequirements(method);

        }
    }

    private void handleChecksumFailure(String checksumPolicy, String message, Throwable cause)
            throws ChecksumFailedException {
        if (ArtifactRepositoryPolicy.CHECKSUM_POLICY_FAIL.equals(checksumPolicy)) {
            throw new ChecksumFailedException(message, cause);
        } else if (!ArtifactRepositoryPolicy.CHECKSUM_POLICY_IGNORE.equals(checksumPolicy)) {