* Overlapping ranges and empty ranges are forbidden, though adjacent ranges are permitted and
   * will be merged.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any ranges overlap or are empty
   * @since 21.0
   */
  public static <C extends Comparable<?>> ImmutableRangeSet<C> copyOf(Iterable<Range<C>> ranges) {
    return new ImmutableRangeSet.Builder<C>().addAll(ranges).build();
  }

        checkInvalidRange("[1.0,1.0)");
        checkInvalidRange("(1.0,1.0)");
        checkInvalidRange("[1.1,1.0]");
        checkInvalidRange("[1.0,1.2),1.3");
        // overlap
        checkInvalidRange("[1.0,1.2),(1.1,1.3]");
        // overlap
        checkInvalidRange("[1.1,1.3),(1.0,1.2]");
        // ordering
        checkInvalidRange("(1.1,1.2],[1.0,1.1)");
    }

    @Test

justify-content: center;\n  z-index: 50;\n}\n\n.card .overlay > .fa,\n.card .overlay > .fas,\n.card .overlay > .far,\n.card .overlay > .fab,\n.card .overlay > .fal,\n.card .overlay > .fad,\n.card .overlay > .svg-inline--fa,\n.card .overlay > .ion,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fa,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fas,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .far,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fab,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fal,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .fad,\n.overlay-wrapper .overlay > .svg-inline--fa,\n.overlay-wrapper...

.overlay>.fad,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.fal,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.far,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.fas,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.ion,.overlay-wrapper .overlay>.svg-inline--fa,.small-box .overlay>.fa,.small-box .overlay>.fab,.small-box .overlay>.fad,.small-box .overlay>.fal,.small-box .overlay>.far,.small-box .overlay>.fas,.small-box .overlay>.ion,.small-box .overlay>.svg-inline--fa{color:#343a40}.card .overlay.dark,.info-box .overlay.dark,.overlay-wrapper .overlay.dark,.small-box .overlay.dark{backg...

Also, the best approach was to use already existing standards.

So, before even starting to code **FastAPI**, I spent several months studying the specs for OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Understanding their relationship, overlap, and differences.

## Design { #design }

Then I spent some time designing the developer "API" I wanted to have as a user (as a developer using FastAPI).

                assertNotEquals(attributes[i], attributes[j], "Attributes should have distinct values");
                assertEquals(0, attributes[i] & attributes[j], "Attributes should not overlap in bit patterns");
            }
        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should have resource types with power-of-2 values")
    void testResourceTypeBitPatterns() {

        }
    }

    private RepositorySystemSession getSession(ArtifactRepository localRepository) {
        return LegacyLocalRepositoryManager.overlay(localRepository, legacySupport.getRepositorySession(), null);
    }

    private void injectSession1(RepositoryRequest request, MavenSession session) {
        if (session != null) {

 *
 * Mappings Data (4,719 bytes)
 * ===========================
 *
 * This is UTF-8 character data. It is indexed into by b2b3 in the ranges dataset.
 *
 * Mappings may overlap.
 *
 * ASCII-Only
 * ==========
 *
 * Neither the section index nor the ranges data use bit 0x80 anywhere. That means the data is

            assertEquals(0x0002, Smb2Constants.SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_REQUIRED, "Signing required flag must be 0x0002");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Signing flags should not overlap")
        void testSigningFlagsNoOverlap() {
            assertNotEquals(Smb2Constants.SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_ENABLED, Smb2Constants.SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_REQUIRED,
                    "Signing flags must be distinct");

	}

	if cap(t.requestsPool) != apiRequestsMaxPerNode {
		// Only replace if needed.
		// Existing requests will use the previous limit,
		// but new requests will use the new limit.
		// There will be a short overlap window,
		// but this shouldn't last long.
		t.requestsPool = make(chan struct{}, apiRequestsMaxPerNode)
	}
	listQuorum := cfg.ListQuorum
	if listQuorum == "" {
		listQuorum = "strict"
	}