---
name: Feature request
about: Suggest an idea
title: ''
labels: enhancement
assignees: ''

---

Start by telling us what problem you’re trying to solve. Often a solution already exists!

 * iterator} method only once, and should be tested using this class. Exceptions to this rule should
 * be clearly documented.
 *
 * <p>Note that although your APIs should be liberal in what they accept, your methods which
 * <i>return</i> iterables should make every attempt to return ones of the robust variety.
 *
 * <p>This testing utility is not thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion

**Describe the bug**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '....'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error

**Expected behavior**
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

**Screenshots**
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

labels: kind/feature
body:
  - type: textarea
    id: feature
    attributes:
      label: What would you like to be added?
      description: |
        Feature requests are unlikely to make progress as issues. Please consider engaging with SIGs on slack and mailing lists, instead.
        A proposal that works through the design along with the implications of the change can be opened as a KEP.

   * of the function, thus time. Thus, the RateLimiter becomes /faster/ after a period of
   * underutilization. If, on the other hand, we pick a function that goes /above/ that horizontal
   * line, then it means that the area (time) is increased, thus storedPermits are more costly than
   * fresh permits, thus the RateLimiter becomes /slower/ after a period of underutilization.
   *

  public void testConstraint() {
    /*
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */
    map.put(Integer.class, new Integer(5));

 * }
 *
 * The calls to {@link #isSubtype} and {@link #notSubtype} tells the framework what assertions need
 * to be made.
 *
 * <p>The declaration methods must be public.
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // only used by android incompatible tests.
@NullUnmarked
abstract class SubtypeTester implements Cloneable {

  /** Annotates a public method that declares subtype assertion. */
  @RequiredModifiers(modifier = Modifier.PUBLIC)

        writeInt2(informationLevel, dst, dstIndex);
        dstIndex += 2;

        /* windows98 has what appears to be another 4 0's followed by the share
         * name as a zero terminated ascii string "\TMP" + '\0'
         *
         * As is this works, but it deviates from the spec section 4.1.6.6 but
         * maybe I should put it in. Wonder what NT does?
         */

        return dstIndex - start;
    }

    @Override

     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *

 * }
 *
 * The calls to {@link #isSubtype} and {@link #notSubtype} tells the framework what assertions need
 * to be made.
 *
 * <p>The declaration methods must be public.
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // only used by android incompatible tests.
@NullUnmarked
abstract class SubtypeTester implements Cloneable {

  /** Annotates a public method that declares subtype assertion. */
  @RequiredModifiers(modifier = Modifier.PUBLIC)