/**
   * Returns an element less than the {@link #samples()} and less than {@link
   * #belowSamplesGreater()}.
   */
  E belowSamplesLesser();

  /**
   * Returns an element less than the {@link #samples()} but greater than {@link
   * #belowSamplesLesser()}.
   */
  E belowSamplesGreater();

  /**
   * Returns an element greater than the {@link #samples()} but less than {@link
   * #aboveSamplesGreater()}.
   */

        "Payload size must be less than or equal to 125",
      )
    }
  }

  @Test fun pongTooLongThrows() {
    assertFailsWith<IllegalArgumentException> {
      serverWriter.writePong((binaryData(1000)))
    }.also { expected ->
      assertThat(expected.message).isEqualTo(
        "Payload size must be less than or equal to 125",
      )
    }
  }

     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather
     * than "less than or equal to" because of *handwave* the difference between "endpoints of
     * inclusive ranges" and "Cuts."
     */

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if each element in {@code iterable} after the first is greater than or
   * equal to the element that preceded it, according to the specified comparator. Note that this is
   * always true when the iterable has fewer than two elements.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> boolean isInOrder(
      Iterable<? extends T> iterable, Comparator<T> comparator) {

  }

  private static long random() {
    return randomSource.nextLong();
  }

  // A random value that cannot be 0 and that is unsigned-less-than or equal
  // to the given dividend, so that we don't have half of our divisions being
  // trivial because the divisor is bigger than the dividend.
  // Using remainder here does not give us a uniform distribution but it should
  // not have a big impact on the measurement.

 * using the latest values obtained from {@link IteratorTester#newTargetIterator()}.
 *
 * <p>The value you pass to the parameter {@code steps} should be greater than the length of your
 * iterator, so that this class can check that your iterator behaves correctly when it is exhausted.
 *
 * <p>For example, to test {@link java.util.Collections#unmodifiableList(java.util.List)

      if (collection.size() <= 2L * k) {
        // In this case, just dumping the collection to an array and sorting is
        // faster than using the implementation for Iterator, which is
        // specialized for k much smaller than n.

        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // c only contains E's and doesn't escape
        E[] array = (E[]) collection.toArray();
        sort(array, this);

 * passing in unsanitized user data then a malicious user could force it. A light shuffle of the
 * data using an unpredictable seed should normally be enough to thwart this attack.
 *
 * <p>The time taken to compute multiple quantiles on the same dataset using {@link Scale#indexes

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>