Mas o login do Facebook não tem suporte para OpenID Connect. Ele tem a própria implementação do OAuth2.

### OpenID (não "OpenID Connect")

Houve também uma especificação “OpenID”. Ela tentou resolver a mesma coisa que a **OpenID Connect**, mas não baseada em OAuth2.

Então, ela foi um sistema adicional completo.

Ela não é muito popular ou usada nos dias de hoje.

## OpenAPI

 * granted immediately, but it is the <i>next</i> request that will experience extra throttling,
 * thus paying for the cost of the expensive task.
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @since 13.0
 */
// TODO(user): switch to nano precision. A natural unit of cost is "bytes", and a micro precision
// would mean a maximum rate of "1MB/s", which might be small in some cases.
@Beta
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible

        as described in Section 3.1, and You must inform recipients of the
        Executable Form how they can obtain a copy of such Source Code Form by
        reasonable means in a timely manner, at a charge no more than the cost
        of distribution to the recipient; and

     b. You may distribute such Executable Form under the terms of this
        License, or sublicense it under different terms, provided that the

 * if any intersection is found. The sizes of both arguments are assumed to be so small, and the
 * likelihood of an intersection so great, that it is not worth the CPU cost of sorting or the
 * memory cost of hashing.
 */
internal fun Array<String>.hasIntersection(
  other: Array<String>?,
  comparator: Comparator<in String>,
): Boolean {
  if (isEmpty() || other == null || other.isEmpty()) {

                n++;
                int size = chain.size();
                int cost = chain.getCreditCost();
                CommonServerMessageBlockRequest next = chain.getNext();
                if ( log.isTraceEnabled() ) {
                    log.trace(
                        String.format("%s costs %d avail %d (%s)", chain.getClass().getName(), cost, this.credits.availablePermits(), this.name));
                }

Dada a simplicidade do Flask, parecia uma ótima opção para construção de APIs. A próxima coisa a procurar era um "Django REST Framework" para Flask.

!!! check "**FastAPI** inspirado para"
    Ser um microframework. Fazer ele fácil para misturar e combinar com ferramentas e partes necessárias.

 *   long xBits = Double.doubleToRawLongBits(x);
 *   long yBits = Double.doubleToRawLongBits(y);
 *   return xBits == yBits;
 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>It is possible to write a more scalable updater, at the cost of giving up strict atomicity.
 * See for example <a
 * href="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jsr166/dist/docs/java.base/java/util/concurrent/atomic/DoubleAdder.html">
 * DoubleAdder</a>.
 *
 * @author Doug Lea

    for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
      checkElementNotNull(array[i], i);
    }
    return array;
  }

  // We do this instead of Preconditions.checkNotNull to save boxing and array
  // creation cost.
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static Object checkElementNotNull(@CheckForNull Object element, int index) {
    if (element == null) {
      throw new NullPointerException("at index " + index);
    }
    return element;

    }
    sink1.writeUtf8("def")
    sink1.close()
    assertFailsWith<ConnectionShutdownException> {
      connection.newStream(headerEntries("c", "cola"), true)
    }
    assertThat(stream1.isOpen).isTrue()
    assertThat(stream2.isOpen).isFalse()
    assertThat(connection.openStreamCount()).isEqualTo(1)

    // Verify the peer received what was expected.

   *
   * Note well that if, for this function, we chose a horizontal line, at height of exactly (1/QPS),
   * then the effect of the function is non-existent: we serve storedPermits at exactly the same
   * cost as fresh ones (1/QPS is the cost for each). We use this trick later.
   *
   * If we pick a function that goes /below/ that horizontal line, it means that we reduce the area