* pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for
       * consistency with how weak references are cleared). That's a behavior change -- arguably the
       * removal of a feature.
       *
       * Fortunately, exceptions rarely contain references to expensive resources.
       */

			// be skipped.
			t.Logf("HasGoBuild is false on %s", b)
			return
		}

		t.Fatalf("HasGoBuild unexpectedly false on %s", b)
	}

	t.Logf("HasGoBuild is true; checking consistency with other functions")

	hasExec := false
	hasExecGo := false
	t.Run("MustHaveExec", func(t *testing.T) {
		testenv.MustHaveExec(t)
		hasExec = true
	})
	t.Run("MustHaveExecPath", func(t *testing.T) {

	if h.flags&hashWriting != 0 {
		fatal("concurrent map writes")
	}
	key := stringStructOf(&s)
	hash := t.Hasher(noescape(unsafe.Pointer(&s)), uintptr(h.hash0))

	// Set hashWriting after calling t.hasher for consistency with mapassign.
	h.flags ^= hashWriting

	if h.buckets == nil {
		h.buckets = newobject(t.Bucket) // newarray(t.bucket, 1)
	}

again:
	bucket := hash & bucketMask(h.B)
	if h.growing() {

        Configuration pmdAdditionalAuxDepsConfiguration = configurations.getByName(PMD_ADDITIONAL_AUX_DEPS_CONFIGURATION);

        // TODO: Consider checking if the resolution consistency is enabled for compile/runtime.

// interface information. It is used for reducing the cost of IPv6
// addressing scope zone resolution.
//
// Multiple names sharing the index are managed by first-come
// first-served basis for consistency.
type ipv6ZoneCache struct {
	sync.RWMutex                // guard the following
	lastFetched  time.Time      // last time routing information was fetched
	toIndex      map[string]int // interface name to its index

    return CollectCollectors.toImmutableSet();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the empty immutable set. Preferred over {@link Collections#emptySet} for code
   * consistency, and because the return type conveys the immutability guarantee.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> the instance returned is a singleton.
   */

So, while the physical project layout is the same, the logical results are different.

[[sec:naming_recommendations]]
== Naming recommendations

As your project grows, naming and consistency get increasingly more important.
To keep your builds maintainable, we recommend the following:

1. *Keep default project names for subprojects*:
It is possible to configure custom project names in the settings file.

	upper := ToUpper(s)
	lower := ToLower(s)

	// Consistency checks
	if n := utf8.RuneCountInString(upper); n != numRunes {
		t.Error("rune count wrong in upper:", n)
	}
	if n := utf8.RuneCountInString(lower); n != numRunes {
		t.Error("rune count wrong in lower:", n)
	}
	if !equal("ToUpper(upper)", ToUpper(upper), upper, t) {
		t.Error("ToUpper(upper) consistency fail")
	}

	// Note that POSIX only defines the semantics for symlinks, not for
	// mount points or other surrogate reparse points, but we treat them
	// the same way for consistency. Also, mount points can contain infinite
	// loops, so it is not safe to walk them without special handling.
	if !fs.isReparseTagNameSurrogate() {
		if fs.FileAttributes&syscall.FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY != 0 {

        AbstractFuture<? extends V> other = (AbstractFuture<? extends V>) delegate;
        value = other.value;
        throwable = other.throwable;
        // don't copy the mayInterruptIfRunning bit, for consistency with the server, to ensure that
        // interruptTask() is called if and only if the bit is true and because we cannot infer the
        // interrupt status from non AbstractFuture futures.
        state = other.state;