// Mismatch indexes with distribution order
				inconsistent++
			}
		}
	}

	erasureDistributionReliable := true
	if inconsistent > len(partsMetadata)/2 {
		// If there are too many inconsistent files, then we can't trust erasure.Distribution (most likely
		// because of bugs found in CopyObject/PutObjectTags) https://github.com/minio/minio/pull/10772
		erasureDistributionReliable = false
	}

    resetWithHole();
    assertEquals(c, navigableSet.higher(a));
    assertEquals(c, navigableSet.higher(b));
    assertEquals(null, navigableSet.higher(c));
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): make "too small" and "too large" elements available for better navigation
   * testing. At that point, we may be able to eliminate the "hole" tests, which would mean that
   * ContiguousSet's tests would no longer need to suppress them.
   */

So, the path parameter will be extracted, validated, converted to the specified type and annotated with OpenAPI.

The same way, you can declare any other parameter as normally, and additionally, get the `Request` too.

///

## `Request` documentation

You can read more details about the <a href="https://www.starlette.io/requests/" class="external-link" target="_blank">`Request` object in the official Starlette documentation site</a>.

        artifact.addMetadata(metadata);
    }

    private ArtifactMetadata createMetadata(Artifact artifact) {
        Versioning versioning = new Versioning();
        // TODO Should this be changed for MNG-6754 too?
        versioning.updateTimestamp();
        versioning.addVersion(artifact.getVersion());

        if (artifact.isRelease()) {
            versioning.setRelease(artifact.getVersion());
        }

     * instance construction.
     *
     * @param session the Maven session
     * @throws MavenExecutionException in case of issue
     */
    // TODO This is too early for build extensions, so maybe just remove it?
    public void afterSessionStart(MavenSession session) throws MavenExecutionException {
        // do nothing
    }

    /**

        .withFeatures(features)
        .suppressing(parentBuilder.getSuppressedTests())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  /**
   * Returns an array of four bogus elements that will always be too high or too low for the
   * display. This includes two values for each extreme.
   *
   * <p>This method (dangerously) assume that the strings {@code "!! a"} and {@code "~~ z"} will

   *
   * @param value any {@code long} value
   * @return the same value cast to {@code byte} if it is in the range of the {@code byte} type,
   *     {@link Byte#MAX_VALUE} if it is too large, or {@link Byte#MIN_VALUE} if it is too small
   */
  public static byte saturatedCast(long value) {
    if (value > Byte.MAX_VALUE) {
      return Byte.MAX_VALUE;
    }
    if (value < Byte.MIN_VALUE) {
      return Byte.MIN_VALUE;

      UnsignedLong unsignedValue = UnsignedLong.fromLongBits(value);
      assertThat(unsignedValue.toString()).isEqualTo(unsignedValue.bigIntegerValue().toString());
    }
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // too slow
  public void testToStringRadix() {
    for (int radix = Character.MIN_RADIX; radix <= Character.MAX_RADIX; radix++) {
      for (long l : TEST_LONGS) {
        UnsignedLong value = UnsignedLong.fromLongBits(l);

And whenever you output that data, even if the source had duplicates, it will be output as a set of unique items.

And it will be annotated / documented accordingly too.

## Nested Models

Each attribute of a Pydantic model has a type.

But that type can itself be another Pydantic model.

## Second dependency, "dependable" and "dependant"

Then you can create another dependency function (a "dependable") that at the same time declares a dependency of its own (so it is a "dependant" too):

//// tab | Python 3.10+

```Python hl_lines="13"
{!> ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial005_an_py310.py!}
```

////

//// tab | Python 3.9+

```Python hl_lines="13"