`You did!' said the Hatter.

  `I deny it!' said the March Hare.

  `He denies it,' said the King:  `leave out that part.'

  `Well, at any rate, the Dormouse said--' the Hatter went on,
looking anxiously round to see if he would deny it too:  but the
Dormouse denied nothing, being fast asleep.

  `After that,' continued the Hatter, `I cut some more bread-
and-butter--'

 *   <li>No stats are modified by operations invoked on the {@linkplain Cache#asMap asMap} view of
 *       the cache.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>A lookup is specifically defined as an invocation of one of the methods {@link
 * LoadingCache#get(Object)}, {@link LoadingCache#getUnchecked(Object)}, {@link Cache#get(Object,
 * Callable)}, or {@link LoadingCache#getAll(Iterable)}.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry

 *   <li>No stats are modified by operations invoked on the {@linkplain Cache#asMap asMap} view of
 *       the cache.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>A lookup is specifically defined as an invocation of one of the methods {@link
 * LoadingCache#get(Object)}, {@link LoadingCache#getUnchecked(Object)}, {@link Cache#get(Object,
 * Callable)}, or {@link LoadingCache#getAll(Iterable)}.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry

     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: http://goo.gl/okTTdr
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map

     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: http://goo.gl/okTTdr
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map

  // that are considered authoritative for the behavior of that escaper.

  private static final Escaper HTML_ESCAPER =
      Escapers.builder()
          .addEscape('"', """)
          // Note: "'" is not defined in HTML 4.01.
          .addEscape('\'', "'")
          .addEscape('&', "&")
          .addEscape('<', "&lt;")
          .addEscape('>', "&gt;")
          .build();

  private HtmlEscapers() {}

  /**
   * Adds or removes the necessary occurrences of an element such that the element attains the
   * desired count.
   *
   * @param element the element to add or remove occurrences of; may be null only if explicitly
   *     allowed by the implementation
   * @param count the desired count of the element in this multiset
   * @return the count of the element before the operation; possibly zero

import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.LinkedHashSet;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.SortedSet;

/**
 * Optional features of classes derived from {@code Collection}.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // maybe avoidable if we rework the whole package?
@GwtCompatible

  static final Integer N4 = 4;
  static final Integer N5 = 5;
  static final Integer NODE_NOT_IN_GRAPH = 1000;

  // TODO(user): Consider separating Strings that we've defined here to capture
  // identifiable substrings of expected error messages, from Strings that we've defined
  // here to provide error messages.
  // TODO(user): Some Strings used in the subclasses can be added as static Strings
  // here too.

 * @since 9.0
 */
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ktIncompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class Enums {

  private Enums() {}

  /**
   * Returns the {@link Field} in which {@code enumValue} is defined. For example, to get the {@code
   * Description} annotation on the {@code GOLF} constant of enum {@code Sport}, use {@code
   * Enums.getField(Sport.GOLF).getAnnotation(Description.class)}.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */