- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 11 - 20 of 21 for artifactId (0.17 sec)
-
guava-testlib/pom.xml
<dependency> <groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId> <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.checkerframework</groupId> <artifactId>checker-qual</artifactId> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>com.google.errorprone</groupId> <artifactId>error_prone_annotations</artifactId> </dependency> <dependency>
XML - Registered: Fri Apr 26 12:43:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Mon Jul 31 18:55:22 GMT 2023 - 3.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava-gwt/pom.xml
<artifactId>j2objc-annotations</artifactId> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId> <artifactId>guava-testlib</artifactId> <version>${project.version}</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>com.google.guava</groupId> <artifactId>guava-testlib</artifactId> <version>${project.version}</version>
XML - Registered: Fri Apr 26 12:43:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu Apr 11 15:00:55 GMT 2024 - 19.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava-tests/test/com/google/common/base/AndroidIncompatible.java
* <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even * <i>compile</i> against Android. Now, this might be an artifact of our build system, one * that we could probably work around. Or we could manually strip the test from open-source * Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
Java - Registered: Fri Apr 19 12:43:09 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Jul 07 15:40:13 GMT 2023 - 3.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/ListenableFuture.java
/* * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
Java - Registered: Fri Apr 26 12:43:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Mon Jun 26 21:13:41 GMT 2023 - 8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml
# of the value entered here. publish_results: true # Upload the results as artifacts (optional). Commenting out will disable uploads of run results in SARIF # format to the repository Actions tab. - name: "Upload artifact" uses: actions/upload-artifact@65462800fd760344b1a7b4382951275a0abb4808 # v4.3.3 with: name: SARIF file path: results.sarif
Others - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Mon Apr 29 23:37:56 GMT 2024 - 2.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/AbstractFuture.java
* We should annotate the superclass, InternalFutureFailureAccess, to say that its copy of this * method returns @Nullable, too. However, we're not sure if we want to make any changes to that * class, since it's in a separate artifact that we planned to release only a single version of. */ @CheckForNull protected final Throwable tryInternalFastPathGetFailure() { if (this instanceof Trusted) { Object obj = value;
Java - Registered: Fri Apr 26 12:43:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Mon Apr 22 21:17:24 GMT 2024 - 63K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava-tests/test/com/google/common/util/concurrent/ListenableFutureTest.java
public void testNoNewApis() throws Exception { assertWithMessage( "Do not add new methods to ListenableFuture. Its API needs to continue to match the" + " version we released in a separate artifact com.google.guava:listenablefuture.") .that(ListenableFuture.class.getDeclaredMethods()) .asList() .containsExactly(
Java - Registered: Fri Apr 12 12:43:09 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu Jun 15 19:48:16 GMT 2023 - 1.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/base/AndroidIncompatible.java
* <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even * <i>compile</i> against Android. Now, this might be an artifact of our build system, one * that we could probably work around. Or we could manually strip the test from open-source * Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
Java - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Jul 07 15:40:13 GMT 2023 - 3.9K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/util/concurrent/ListenableFutureTest.java
public void testNoNewApis() throws Exception { assertWithMessage( "Do not add new methods to ListenableFuture. Its API needs to continue to match the" + " version we released in a separate artifact com.google.guava:listenablefuture.") .that(ListenableFuture.class.getDeclaredMethods()) .asList() .containsExactly(
Java - Registered: Fri May 03 12:43:13 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Thu Jun 15 19:48:16 GMT 2023 - 1.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
futures/listenablefuture1/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/ListenableFuture.java
/* * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
Java - Registered: Fri Apr 26 12:43:10 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Mon Jun 26 21:13:41 GMT 2023 - 8K bytes - Viewed (0)