import javax.annotation.Nonnull;
import javax.annotation.meta.TypeQualifierDefault;

/**
 * Marks all "top-level" types as non-null in a way that is recognized by Kotlin. Note that this
 * unfortunately includes type-variable usages, so we also provide {@link ParametricNullness} to
 * "undo" it as best we can.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Target(TYPE)
@TypeQualifierDefault({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER})
@Nonnull

       * it).
       */
      return false;
    }
  }

  private static final class RecordingRunnable implements Runnable {
    final CountDownLatch wasRun = new CountDownLatch(1);

    // synchronized so that checkState works as expected.
    @Override
    public synchronized void run() {
      checkState(wasRun.getCount() > 0);
      wasRun.countDown();
    }
  }

import javax.annotation.Nonnull;
import javax.annotation.meta.TypeQualifierDefault;

/**
 * Marks all "top-level" types as non-null in a way that is recognized by Kotlin. Note that this
 * unfortunately includes type-variable usages, so we also provide {@link ParametricNullness} to
 * "undo" it as best we can.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Target(TYPE)
@TypeQualifierDefault({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER})
@Nonnull

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

  @Override
  public boolean wasStreamClosed() {
    return byteSink.wasStreamClosed();
  }

  @Override
  public Writer openStream() throws IOException {
    // using TestByteSink's output stream to get option behavior, so flush to it on every write
    return new FilterWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(byteSink.openStream(), UTF_8)) {
      @Override
      public void write(int c) throws IOException {
        super.write(c);
        flush();

 *       #toString} behavior you expect
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to
 *       hunt through classes like {@link Arrays} and {@link Ints} for them.
 *   <li>Supports a copy-free {@link #subArray} view, so methods that accept this type don't need to
 *       add overloads that accept start and end indexes.

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

 * Condition.signal}).
 *
 * <p>A thread is said to <i>occupy</i> a monitor if it has <i>entered</i> the monitor but not yet
 * <i>left</i>. Only one thread may occupy a given monitor at any moment. A monitor is also
 * reentrant, so a thread may enter a monitor any number of times, and then must leave the same
 * number of times. The <i>enter</i> and <i>leave</i> operations have the same synchronization

 *       #toString} behavior you expect.
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to
 *       hunt through classes like {@link Arrays} and {@link Doubles} for them.
 *   <li>Supports a copy-free {@link #subArray} view, so methods that accept this type don't need to
 *       add overloads that accept start and end indexes.