public void testIndexOfImpl_null() {
    List<String> toTest;
    try {
      toTest = createList(String.class, null, "A", "B", null, "C", null);
    } catch (NullPointerException e) {
      // example cannot handle nulls, test invalid
      return;
    }
    int[] expected = {0, 1, 2, 0, 4, 0};
    checkIndexOf(toTest, expected);
  }

  public void testLastIndexOfImpl_nonNull() {

 *       The generated suite for {@code FooTest} ends up containing {@code FooTest} itself plus some
 *       other tests. We want to exclude the other tests (which Android can't handle) while
 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code

                .named("Longs.asList, tail subList"),
            ListTestSuiteBuilder.using(new LongsAsListMiddleSubListGenerator())
                .named("Longs.asList, middle subList"));

    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    for (ListTestSuiteBuilder<Long> builder : builders) {
      suite.addTest(
          builder
              .withFeatures(
                  CollectionSize.ONE,

   * declaredType}. Example usage:
   *
   * <pre>
   * try {
   *   someMethodThatCouldThrowAnything();
   * } catch (IKnowWhatToDoWithThisException e) {
   *   handle(e);
   * } catch (Throwable t) {
   *   Throwables.propagateIfInstanceOf(t, IOException.class);
   *   Throwables.propagateIfInstanceOf(t, SQLException.class);
   *   throw Throwables.propagate(t);
   * }
   * </pre>

   * declaredType}. Example usage:
   *
   * <pre>
   * try {
   *   someMethodThatCouldThrowAnything();
   * } catch (IKnowWhatToDoWithThisException e) {
   *   handle(e);
   * } catch (Throwable t) {
   *   Throwables.propagateIfInstanceOf(t, IOException.class);
   *   Throwables.propagateIfInstanceOf(t, SQLException.class);
   *   throw Throwables.propagate(t);
   * }
   * </pre>

 * {@link #escapeUnsafe} is overridden to handle general escaping of the form {@code &#NNNNN;}.
 *
 * <p>The size of the data structure used by {@link ArrayBasedUnicodeEscaper} is proportional to the
 * highest valued code point that requires escaping. For example a replacement map containing the
 * single character '{@code \}{@code u1000}' will require approximately 16K of memory. If you need

   *       you can decrease the number of tasks from 15 and 10, killing off the final 5 tasks, and
   *       {@code consistentHash} will handle it. If, however, you are dividing traffic among
   *       servers {@code alpha}, {@code bravo}, and {@code charlie} and you occasionally need to

                .named("ImmutableDoubleArray.asList, tail subList"),
            ListTestSuiteBuilder.using(new ImmutableDoubleArrayMiddleSubListAsListGenerator())
                .named("ImmutableDoubleArray.asList, middle subList"));

    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    for (ListTestSuiteBuilder<Double> builder : builders) {
      suite.addTest(
          builder
              .withFeatures(

                .named("ImmutableLongArray.asList, tail subList"),
            ListTestSuiteBuilder.using(new ImmutableLongArrayMiddleSubListAsListGenerator())
                .named("ImmutableLongArray.asList, middle subList"));

    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    for (ListTestSuiteBuilder<Long> builder : builders) {
      suite.addTest(
          builder
              .withFeatures(

       * TODO(cpovirk): Consider removing @CheckForNull here, as we've done with the other methods'
       * errorMessageTemplate parameters: It is unlikely that callers intend for their string
       * template to be null (though we do handle that case gracefully at runtime). I've left this
       * one as it is because one of our users has defined a wrapper API around Preconditions,