* resulting {@link HashCode} is dependent only on the bytes inserted, and the order in which they
 * were inserted, not how those bytes were chunked into discrete put() operations. For example, the
 * following three expressions all generate colliding hash codes:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * newHasher().putByte(b1).putByte(b2).putByte(b3).hash()
 * newHasher().putByte(b1).putBytes(new byte[] { b2, b3 }).hash()
 * newHasher().putBytes(new byte[] { b1, b2, b3 }).hash()

            .createTestSuite());

    suite.addTest(
        SetTestSuiteBuilder.using(new DegeneratedImmutableSetGenerator())
            .named(ImmutableSetTest.class.getName() + ", degenerate")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ONE,
                CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER,
                CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES)
            .createTestSuite());

    }
  }

  public void testCartesianProduct_hashCode() {
    // Run through the same cartesian products we tested above

    Set<List<Integer>> degenerate = Sets.cartesianProduct();
    checkHashCode(degenerate);

    checkHashCode(Sets.cartesianProduct(set(1, 2)));

    int num = Integer.MAX_VALUE / 3 * 2; // tickle overflow-related problems

   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> If passing a single element {@code e}, the {@code Stream} equivalent
   * of this method is {@code Stream.generate(() -> e)}. Otherwise, put the elements in a collection
   * and use {@code Stream.generate(() -> collection).flatMap(Collection::stream)}.
   */
  @SafeVarargs
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Iterable<T> cycle(T... elements) {

    return (bits + 31) & ~31;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a hash function which computes its hash code by concatenating the hash codes of the
   * underlying hash functions together. This can be useful if you need to generate hash codes of a
   * specific length.
   *
   * <p>For example, if you need 1024-bit hash codes, you could join two {@link Hashing#sha512} hash

          // Since this is an artificially generated type variable, we don't bother checking
          // subtyping between declared type bound and actual type bound. So it's possible that we
          // may generate something like <capture#1-of ? extends Foo&SubFoo>.
          // Checking subtype between declared and actual type bounds
          // adds recursive isSubtypeOf() call and feels complicated.

 * <p>{@code GwtTestSuiteGenerator} expects every {@code DerivedIterator} implementation to provide
 * a one-arg constructor accepting its inner generator as an argument. This requirement enables it
 * to generate source code (since GWT cannot use reflection to generate the suites).
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtCompatible
public interface DerivedGenerator {
  TestSubjectGenerator<?> getInnerGenerator();

    // cause system property.  This allows us to run with both settings of the property in one jvm
    // without resorting to even crazier hacks to reset static final boolean fields.
    System.setProperty("guava.concurrent.generate_cancellation_cause", "true");
    final String concurrentPackage = SettableFuture.class.getPackage().getName();
    classReloader =
        new URLClassLoader(ClassPathUtil.getClassPathUrls()) {

  static final boolean GENERATE_CANCELLATION_CAUSES;

  static {
    // System.getProperty may throw if the security policy does not permit access.
    boolean generateCancellationCauses;
    try {
      generateCancellationCauses =
          Boolean.parseBoolean(
              System.getProperty("guava.concurrent.generate_cancellation_cause", "false"));
    } catch (SecurityException e) {

    linkedHashMultiset = LinkedHashMultiset.create(size);
    treeMultiset = TreeMultiset.create();

    Random random = new Random();

    int sizeRemaining = size;

    // TODO(kevinb): generate better test contents for multisets
    for (int i = 0; sizeRemaining > 0; i++) {
      // The JVM will return interned values for small ints.
      Integer value = random.nextInt(1000) + 128;