#   o isReplaceSchemaDirectUse: Does it output the data to playsql directly? (NotRequired - Default false)
    #   o isOverrideExistingDataFile: Does it output to existing files? (NotRequired - Default false)
    #   o isSynchronizeOriginDate: Does it synchronize origin date for date adjustment? (NotRequired - Default false)
    #
    ; loadDataReverseMap = map:{

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()`

But in our code we are actually using `secrets.compare_digest()`.

In short, it will take the same time to compare `stanleyjobsox` to `stanleyjobson` than it takes to compare `johndoe` to `stanleyjobson`. And the same for the password.

That way, using `secrets.compare_digest()` in your application code, it will be safe against this whole range of security attacks.

When you request a URL with OkHttp, here's what it does:

 1. It uses the URL and configured OkHttpClient to create an **address**. This address specifies how we'll connect to the webserver.
 2. It attempts to retrieve a connection with that address from the **connection pool**.

    `OAuth2PasswordBearer` makes **FastAPI** know that it is a security scheme. So it is added that way to OpenAPI.

    But `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm` is just a class dependency that you could have written yourself, or you could have declared `Form` parameters directly.

    But as it's a common use case, it is provided by **FastAPI** directly, just to make it easier.

### Use the form data

!!! tip

        ianaSuites.fromJavaName(it.javaName)
      },
    supported =
      ConnectionSpec.COMPATIBLE_TLS.cipherSuites!!.map {
        ianaSuites.fromJavaName(it.javaName)
      },
  )
}

fun historicOkHttp(version: String): Client {
  val enabled =
    FileSystem.RESOURCES.read("okhttp_$version.txt".toPath()) {
      this.readUtf8().lines().filter { it.isNotBlank() }.map {

        }
    }
}


fun FileSystemOperations.removeCachedScripts(cachesDir: File) {
    if (cachesDir.isDirectory) {
        cachesDir.listFiles()
            .filter { it.isDirectory }
            .flatMap { scriptsCacheDirsUnder(it) }
            .forEach { scriptsCacheDir ->
                logger.lifecycle("Removing scripts cache directory : $scriptsCacheDir")
                delete { delete(scriptsCacheDir) }
            }

The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but is more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

!!! note
    It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

    But in the end, they are implementing the same OAuth2 standard.

        }

        val exitPoints = firTargets
            .mapNotNull { findLast(it) }
            .flatMap { node ->
                node.followingNodes
                    .filter { it !is StubNode }
                    .map { it.unwrap() }
                    .distinct()
                    .sortedBy { it.id }
            }.distinct()

        return exitPoints.size > 1
    }

}

private fun Char.charCode() =
  code.toString(16).let {
    if (it.length < 2) {
      "0$it"
    } else {
      it
    }
  }

internal fun commonHeadersOf(vararg inputNamesAndValues: String): Headers {
  require(inputNamesAndValues.size % 2 == 0) { "Expected alternating header names and values" }

  // Make a defensive copy and clean it up.
  val namesAndValues: Array<String> = arrayOf(*inputNamesAndValues)

                    entryPoints.add(classDetails)
                }
            }
        }

    fun getDependencies() = classes.map { it.value.outputClassFilename to it.value.dependencies.map { it.outputClassFilename } }.toMap()
}


class ClassDetails(val outputClassName: String) {
    var visited: Boolean = false
    val dependencies: MutableSet<ClassDetails> = linkedSetOf()