throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a set that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * element.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedSet}, not this
   * dummy version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always

 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

    private ArrayWithDuplicate(E[] elements, E duplicate) {
      this.elements = elements;
      this.duplicate = duplicate;
    }
  }

  /**
   * @return an array of the proper size with a duplicate element. The size must be at least three.
   */
  protected ArrayWithDuplicate<E> createArrayWithDuplicateElement() {
    E[] elements = createSamplesArray();

       * ClassNotFoundException thereafter.
       *
       * Android API level 26 and JVM8 both let our Error propagate directly the first time and
       * throw NoClassDefFoundError thereafter. This is the proper behavior according to the spec.
       * See https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-12.html#jls-12.4.2 (steps #11 and
       * #5).
       *

/** Unit test for {@link Streams}. */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public class StreamsTest extends TestCase {
  /*
   * Full and proper black-box testing of a Stream-returning method is extremely involved, and is
   * overkill when nearly all Streams are produced using well-tested JDK calls. So, we cheat and
   * just test that the toArray() contents are as expected.

    assertSame(a, numberOrdering.max(ints));
    assertSame(a, numberOrdering.min(ints));
  }

  public void testVarargsMinAndMax() {
    // try the min and max values in all positions, since some values are proper
    // parameters and others are from the varargs array
    assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(9, 3, 0, 5, 8));
    assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(5, 9, 0, 3, 8));

      // If ApiProxy doesn't exist, we're not on AppEngine at all.
      return false;
    } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
      // If ApiProxy throws an exception, we're not in a proper AppEngine environment.
      return false;
    } catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
      // If the method isn't accessible, we're not on a supported version of AppEngine;
      return false;

    assertSame(a, numberOrdering.max(ints));
    assertSame(a, numberOrdering.min(ints));
  }

  public void testVarargsMinAndMax() {
    // try the min and max values in all positions, since some values are proper
    // parameters and others are from the varargs array
    assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(9, 3, 0, 5, 8));
    assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(5, 9, 0, 3, 8));

   * bug where the loop that connects a Listener to each of the futures would die on the last
   * loop-check as done() on ListFuture nulled out the variable being looped over (the list of
   * futures).
   */
  public void testAllAsList_doneFutures() throws Exception {
    // Create input and output
    SettableFuture<String> future1 = SettableFuture.create();

   *
   * <p>NOTE: This method is different from {@link Inet6Address#isIPv4CompatibleAddress} in that it
   * more correctly classifies {@code "::"} and {@code "::1"} as proper IPv6 addresses (which they
   * are), NOT IPv4 compatible addresses (which they are generally NOT considered to be).
   *
   * @param ip {@link Inet6Address} to be examined for embedded IPv4 compatible address format