@Nonnull
    List<RemoteRepository> getRemoteRepositories();

    @Nonnull
    SessionData getData();

    /**
     * Returns immutable user properties to use for interpolation. The user properties have been configured directly
     * by the user, e.g. via the {@code -Dkey=value} parameter on the command line.
     *
     * @return the user properties, never {@code null}
     */
    @Nonnull

            return !(isLocal(url.getHost()) || url.getProtocol().equals("file"));
        } catch (MalformedURLException e) {
            // bad url just skip it here. It should have been validated already, but the wagon lookup will deal with it
            return false;
        }
    }

    private static boolean isLocal(String host) {

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;

// It would be cool if there was a hook that I could use to set up a test environment.
// I want to set up a local/remote repositories for testing but I don't want to have
// to change them when I change the layout of the repositories. So I want to generate
// the structure I want to test by using the artifact handler manager which dictates
// the layout used for a particular artifact type.

/**

 * <p>
 * In their current implementation they are "bolted" onto the lifecycle by separating them
 * into TaskSegments. This class represents the execution context of one such task segment.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * Wise voices have suggested that maybe aggregators shouldn't be bound to the ordinary
 * lifecycle at all, in which case we wouldn't be needing this class at all ( and

 * is mapped to an equally named property of the bean and converted. The properties of the bean are supposed to either
 * have a public setter or be backed by an equally named field (of any visibility).
 *
 * @since 3.0
 */
public interface BeanConfigurator {

    /**
     * Performs the specified bean configuration.
     *

        // Then
        if (parameterExpectedResult instanceof SelectedProjectsResult) {
            assertThat(result.hasErrors())
                    .withFailMessage("Expected result not to have errors")
                    .isFalse();
            List<String> expectedProjectNames = ((SelectedProjectsResult) parameterExpectedResult).projectNames;

import org.apache.maven.project.MavenProject;

/**
 * Instances of this interface retrieve and store data for the --resume / -r feature. This data is used to ensure newer
 * builds of the same project, that have the -r command-line flag, skip successfully built projects during earlier
 * invocations of Maven.
 */
public interface BuildResumptionDataRepository {
    /**

        assertThrows(
                InvalidVersionSpecificationException.class,
                () -> VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec(version),
                "Version " + version + " should have failed to construct");
    }

    @Test
    void testContains() throws InvalidVersionSpecificationException {
        ArtifactVersion actualVersion = new DefaultArtifactVersion("2.0.5");

 */
@Experimental
public interface ModelBuilderResult {

    /**
     * Gets the sequence of model identifiers that denote the lineage of models from which the effective model was
     * constructed. Model identifiers have the form {@code <groupId>:<artifactId>:<version>}. The first identifier from
     * the list denotes the model on which the model builder was originally invoked. The last identifier will always be

        }

        //
        // TODO jvz Why isn't all this checking the job of the duty of the workspace resolver, we know that we
        // have a model that is suitable, yet more checks are done here and the one for the version is problematic
        // before because with parents as ranges it will never work in this scenario.
        //