// Msgsize returns an upper bound estimate of the number of bytes occupied by the serialized message
func (z *ListObjectVersionsInfo) Msgsize() (s int) {
	s = 1 + 12 + msgp.BoolSize + 11 + msgp.StringPrefixSize + len(z.NextMarker) + 20 + msgp.StringPrefixSize + len(z.NextVersionIDMarker) + 8 + msgp.ArrayHeaderSize
	for za0001 := range z.Objects {
		s += z.Objects[za0001].Msgsize()
	}
	s += 9 + msgp.ArrayHeaderSize
	for za0002 := range z.Prefixes {

 * ```
 *
 * As another example, this code prints the human-readable query parameters of a Twitter search:
 *
 * ```java
 * HttpUrl url = HttpUrl.parse("https://twitter.com/search?q=cute%20%23puppies&f=images");
 * for (int i = 0, size = url.querySize(); i < size; i++) {
 *   System.out.println(url.queryParameterName(i) + ": " + url.queryParameterValue(i));
 * }
 * ```
 *
 * which prints:
 *
 * ```

		// Test case with keyMarker set to 0. (Test number 19).
		{bucketNames[0], "", "min", "", "", 0, listMultipartResults[6], nil, true},
		// Test case with keyMarker less than 0. (Test number 20).
		// {bucketNames[0], "", "min", "", "", -1, listMultipartResults[7], nil, true},
		// The result contains only one entry. The  KeyPrefix is set to the object name in the result.

    set("b", "bb", "bbbb") // size 6
    cache.maxSize = 20
    set("c", "c", "c") // size 12
    assertThat(cache.size()).isEqualTo(12)
  }

  @ParameterizedTest
  @ArgumentsSource(FileSystemParamProvider::class)
  fun shrinkMaxSizeEvicts(parameters: Pair<FileSystem, Boolean>) {
    setUp(parameters.first, parameters.second)
    cache.close()
    createNewCacheWithSize(20)
    set("a", "a", "aaa") // size 4

   * }
   *
   * The alternative natural refactorings into void or Exception-returning methods are much slower.
   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a

				]
			},
			{
				"parallelizationMethod":{
					"name":"TestDistribution"
				},
				"subprojects":[
					"workers",
					"logging"
				]
			}
		],
		"testCoverageUuid":20
	},
	{
		"buckets":[
			{
				"parallelizationMethod":{
					"name":"TestDistribution"
				},
				"subprojects":[
					"dependency-management"
				]
			},
			{

    name: minio
    sources:
    - https://github.com/minio/minio
    urls:
    - https://charts.min.io/helm-releases/minio-4.0.1.tgz
    version: 4.0.1
  - apiVersion: v1
    appVersion: RELEASE.2022-04-26T01-20-24Z
    created: "2024-04-28T03:14:12.185311208-07:00"
    description: Multi-Cloud Object Storage
    digest: f541237e24336ec3f7f45ae0d523fef694e3a2f9ef648c5b11c15734db6ba2b2
    home: https://min.io

   * }
   *
   * The alternative natural refactorings into void or Exception-returning methods are much slower.
   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a

otNode&&(ie=function(e){return E.contains(e.ownerDocument,e)||e.getRootNode(oe)===e.ownerDocument});var ae=function(e,t){return"none"===(e=t||e).style.display||""===e.style.display&&ie(e)&&"none"===E.css(e,"display")};function se(e,t,n,r){var i,o,a=20,s=r?function(){return r.cur()}:function(){return E.css(e,t,"")},u=s(),l=n&&n[3]||(E.cssNumber[t]?"":"px"),c=e.nodeType&&(E.cssNumber[t]||"px"!==l&&+u)&&te.exec(E.css(e,t));if(c&&c[3]!==l){u/=2,l=l||c[3],c=+u||1;while(a--)E.style(e,t,c+l),(1-o)*(1-(...

otNode&&(ie=function(e){return E.contains(e.ownerDocument,e)||e.getRootNode(oe)===e.ownerDocument});var ae=function(e,t){return"none"===(e=t||e).style.display||""===e.style.display&&ie(e)&&"none"===E.css(e,"display")};function se(e,t,n,r){var i,o,a=20,s=r?function(){return r.cur()}:function(){return E.css(e,t,"")},u=s(),l=n&&n[3]||(E.cssNumber[t]?"":"px"),c=e.nodeType&&(E.cssNumber[t]||"px"!==l&&+u)&&te.exec(E.css(e,t));if(c&&c[3]!==l){u/=2,l=l||c[3],c=+u||1;while(a--)E.style(e,t,c+l),(1-o)*(1-(...