}

    @Override
    public IsolatedProject getIsolated() {
        return new DefaultIsolatedProject(this, rootProject);
    }

    @Override
    public DefaultProject evaluate() {
        getProjectEvaluator().evaluate(this, state);
        return this;
    }

    @Override
    public ProjectInternal bindAllModelRules() {
        try {
            getModelRegistry().bindAllReferences();

  // If `must_be_true()` is true this SymbolPredicate represents the proposition
  // "tensor_id() is live and evaluates to true".
  //
  // If `must_be_true()` is false then this SymbolPredicate represents the
  // proposition "tensor_id() is live (and may evaluate to any value)"
  TensorId tensor_id() const { return tensor_id_; }
  bool must_be_true() const { return must_be_true_; }

 private:

	// is not existing
	require.ErrorContains(t, err,
		"no params found for policy binding with `Deny` parameterNotFoundAction")
	require.Len(t, passedParams, 0)
}

// Show that policy still gets evaluated with `nil` param if paramRef & namespaceParamRef
// are both unset
func TestEmptyParamRef(t *testing.T) {
	compiler := &fakeCompiler{}
	matcher := &fakeMatcher{
		DefaultMatch: true,
	}

			},
		},
		{
			name: "expression must evaluate to bool",
			input: schema.Structural{
				Generic: schema.Generic{
					Type: "object",
				},
				ValidationExtensions: schema.ValidationExtensions{
					XValidations: apiextensions.ValidationRules{
						{Rule: "42"},
					},
				},
			},
			expectedResults: []validationMatcher{
				invalidError("must evaluate to a bool"),
			},
		},
		{

   F_0 = forward(args_0, N_0)
   T_0 = core_tpu(args_0, N_0, F_0)
   // B_0 = backward() is not evaluated here.
}

args_1 = update_args(args_0, N_0, T_0)

// Start step 1
C_1 = cond(args_1)
N_1 = non_tpu(args_1)
if (C_1) {
   F_1 = forward(args_1, N_1)
   // T_1 = core_tpu() is not evaluated here.
   // B_1 = backward() is not evaluated here.
}

// Partial update of args. We expect this to be sufficient

			// pointer error. https://golang.org/issue/15125
			"MissingFieldOnNil",
			"{{.MissingField}}",
			(*T)(nil),
			"can't evaluate field MissingField in type *template.T",
		},
		{
			"MissingFieldOnNonNil",
			"{{.MissingField}}",
			&T{},
			"can't evaluate field MissingField in type *template.T",
		},
		{
			"ExistingFieldOnNil",
			"{{.X}}",
			(*T)(nil),

	}

	// 3. If an inline session-policy is present, evaluate it.
	hasSessionPolicy, isAllowedSP := isAllowedBySessionPolicyForServiceAccount(args)
	if hasSessionPolicy {
		return isAllowedSP && (isOwnerDerived || combinedPolicy.IsAllowed(parentArgs))
	}

	// Sub policy not set. Evaluate only the parent policies.
	return (isOwnerDerived || combinedPolicy.IsAllowed(parentArgs))
}

			// pointer error. https://golang.org/issue/15125
			"MissingFieldOnNil",
			"{{.MissingField}}",
			(*T)(nil),
			"can't evaluate field MissingField in type *template.T",
		},
		{
			"MissingFieldOnNonNil",
			"{{.MissingField}}",
			&T{},
			"can't evaluate field MissingField in type *template.T",
		},
		{
			"ExistingFieldOnNil",
			"{{.X}}",
			(*T)(nil),

// coefficients are uniquely determined by the choice of g and n
// (kLanczosGamma and kLanczosCoefficients.size() + 1). The coefficients below
// correspond to [7, 9]. [5, 7], [7, 9], [9, 10], and [607/128.0, 15] were
// evaluated and [7, 9] seemed to be the least sensitive to the quality of the
// log function. In particular, [5, 7] is the only choice where -1.5e-5 <=
// lgamma(2) <= 1.5e-5 for a particularly inaccurate log function.

				"self.something == 1 || self.something == '25%'": 6,
				"self.something == '25%' || self.something == 1": 3,

				// Because the type is dynamic it receives no type checking, and evaluates to false when compared to
				// other types at runtime.
				"self.something != ['anything']": 3,
			},
		},
		{name: "int in intOrString",
			obj: map[string]interface{}{
				"something": int64(1),
			},