},
		{
			description: "successfully called function",
			funcGen: func(cache *claimInfoCache) func() error {
				return func() error {
					return nil
				}
			},
		},
		{
			description: "erroring function",
			funcGen: func(cache *claimInfoCache) func() error {
				return func() error {
					return errors.New("test error")
				}
			},
			wantErr: true,
		},
	} {

    }

    return mlir::WalkResult::advance();
  });

  if (num_submodules > 1) {
    auto num_submodules_error = absl::InternalError(
        "V1 Compat Bridge has more than one submodule. Erroring out.");
    TF_RETURN_IF_ERROR(RecordStatusIfError(
        /*error_prefix=*/"Bridge has more than one submodule:",
        is_in_fallback_enabled_mode, num_submodules_error));
  }

	if err != nil {
		dc.recorder.Eventf(pdb, v1.EventTypeWarning, "CalculateExpectedPodCountFailed", "Failed to calculate the number of expected pods: %v", err)
		return err
	}
	// We have unmamanged pods, instead of erroring and hotlooping in disruption controller, log and continue.
	if len(unmanagedPods) > 0 {
		logger.V(4).Info("Found unmanaged pods associated with this PDB", "pods", unmanagedPods)

    if (data_predecessor || control_predecessor) {
      if (cluster_predecessor_ops.contains(&op)) {
        // Op has a dependency from and to the cluster which is invalid. Instead
        // of erroring out we don't add the op to `cluster_successor_ops` which
        // is in line with previous behavior when certain control dependencies
        // were not considered.

// or informative based on the `exit` flag, please look
// at each implementation of error for added hints.
//
// FIXME: This is an unusual function but serves its purpose for
// now, need to revisit the overall erroring structure here.
// Do not like it :-(
func logFatalErrs(err error, endpoint Endpoint, exit bool) {
	switch {
	case errors.Is(err, errXLBackend):