-		  : memset (s, c, n)))
-#  endif
-# endif
-
-/* GCC < 3.0 optimizes memset(s, 0, n) but not bzero(s, n).
-   The optimization is broken before EGCS 1.1.
-   GCC 3.0+ has __builtin_bzero as well, but at least till GCC 3.4
-   if it decides to call the library function, it calls memset
-   and not bzero.  */
-# if __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 91)
-#  define __bzero(s, n) __builtin_memset (s, '\0', n)
-# endif
-

// `shape_inference::InferenceContext` constructor. Note the following:
//   - The inputs of the `op` are not used for shape inference. So, it is
//     OK to not have the inputs properly set in `op`. See `input_tensors`
//     if you want shape inference to consider the input tensors of the
//     op for shape inference.
//   - The types need not be set in `input_shapes` as it is not used.

    kiwisolver macholib matplotlib nose numpy packaging pandas pickleshare pip \
    prompt-toolkit protobuf psutil pyasn1 pyasn1-modules pycparser Pygments \
    pyparsing pyreadline python-dateutil pytz pywin32 requests rsa setuptools \
    simplegeneric six Tempita traitlets uritemplate urllib3 virtualenv wcwidth \
    wheel win-unicode-console;

# Hardcoding Android license since I did not find any solution on accepting it

  EXPECT_NE(TF_GetCode(status.get()), TF_CANCELLED);
  EXPECT_EQ(TF_GetCode(status.get()), TF_INVALID_ARGUMENT);
  EXPECT_THAT(TF_Message(status.get()), HasSubstr("assertion failed"));

  // Note that future collectives with the same context do not work at the
  // moment; once canceled, the collective executor requires the program to be
  // restarted / context to be reset.
}

TEST(PARALLEL_DEVICE_LIB, TestDifferentShapes) {

// Tensors need gradients to be computed (Tensors which are not used do not need
// any gradients to be computed).
//
// Finally, we start a backprop stack with a set of tape entries for which we
// have all gradients available. This set usually is a subset of the set of
// targets (not all since targets which have outputs in the tape will not have
// gradients available initially).
//

  tensorflow::unwrap(ctx)->SetThreadLocalDevicePlacementPolicy(
      static_cast<tensorflow::ContextDevicePlacementPolicy>(policy));
}

// Note: this function looks up a thread local policy. So it should be called in
// the appropriate client thread. In particular, in async mode, it may not be
// safe to call this function from the async EagerExecutor threads.
extern TFE_ContextDevicePlacementPolicy TFE_ContextGetDevicePlacementPolicy(

using tensorflow::FunctionDef;
using tensorflow::Node;
using tensorflow::NodeBuilder;
using tensorflow::Status;
using tensorflow::errors::InvalidArgument;

namespace {
typedef std::unique_ptr<TF_Function, decltype(&TF_DeleteFunction)>
    UniqueFuncPtr;
}

// struct TF_Operation { tensorflow::Node node; };
static TF_Operation* ToTF_Operation(Node* node) {
  return static_cast<TF_Operation*>(static_cast<void*>(node));

    }
  }
  return found_dtype && found_value;
}

bool IsAddN(const tensorflow::NodeDef& node_def, int n) {
  if (node_def.op() != "AddN" || node_def.name() != "add" ||
      node_def.input_size() != n) {
    return false;
  }
  bool found_t = false;
  bool found_n = false;
  for (const auto& attr : node_def.attr()) {
    if (attr.first == "T") {
      if (attr.second.type() == tensorflow::DT_INT32) {

#include "tensorflow/c/eager/tfe_tensorhandle_internal.h"
#include "tensorflow/c/tf_status_internal.h"
#include "tensorflow/core/lib/core/status_test_util.h"
#include "tensorflow/core/platform/test.h"

// NOTE(allenl): These tests currently go through TFE_Execute and so are
// integration testing rather than purely testing the parallel device. They
// correspond fairly well to the implementation, but testing the C++ directly is

#include "tensorflow/c/c_api.h"
#include "tensorflow/c/c_api_experimental.h"
#include "tensorflow/c/eager/c_api.h"
#include "tensorflow/c/eager/c_api_experimental.h"
#include "tensorflow/core/platform/test.h"

// NOTE(allenl): These tests currently go through TFE_Execute and so are
// integration testing rather than purely testing the parallel device. They
// correspond fairly well to the implementation, but testing the C++ directly is