}

	gp := getg()
	gp.m.mLockProfile.recordUnlock(l)
	gp.m.locks--
	if gp.m.locks < 0 {
		throw("runtime·unlock: lock count")
	}
	if gp.m.locks == 0 && gp.preempt { // restore the preemption request in case we've cleared it in newstack
		gp.stackguard0 = stackPreempt
	}
}

// One-time notifications.
func noteclear(n *note) {
	n.key = 0
}

func notewakeup(n *note) {

			for time.Now().Before(start) {
			}

			// Add work to the local runq to trigger early startm
			// in handoffp.
			go func() {}()

			runtime.LockOSThread()
			runtime.Gosched() // add a preemption point.
			wg.Done()
		}()
	}

	wg.Wait()
	// If both LockOSThreads completed then we did not hit the race.
	println("OK")

				break
			}
		}
	}
	gp.m.mLockProfile.recordUnlock(l)
	gp.m.locks--
	if gp.m.locks < 0 {
		throw("runtime·unlock: lock count")
	}
	if gp.m.locks == 0 && gp.preempt { // restore the preemption request in case we've cleared it in newstack
		gp.stackguard0 = stackPreempt
	}
}

// One-time notifications.
func noteclear(n *note) {
	n.key = 0
}

func notewakeup(n *note) {

// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

//go:build js && wasm

package runtime

import _ "unsafe" // for go:linkname

// js/wasm has no support for threads yet. There is no preemption.

const (
	mutex_unlocked = 0
	mutex_locked   = 1

	note_cleared = 0
	note_woken   = 1
	note_timeout = 2

	active_spin     = 4
	active_spin_cnt = 30
	passive_spin    = 1
)

		// not preemptible. This can cause the loop to block a GC,
		// causing the time limits in TestDeltaContentionz to fail.
		// Since this loop is not very realistic, when using
		// gccgo add preemption points 100 times a second.
		t1 := time.Now()
		for time.Since(start) < dt && time.Since(t1) < 10*time.Millisecond {
			mu1.Lock()
			mu2.Lock()
			mu1.Unlock()
			mu2.Unlock()
		}

 * for (Challenge challenge : response.challenges()) {
 *   // If this is preemptive auth, use a preemptive credential.
 *   if (challenge.scheme().equalsIgnoreCase("OkHttp-Preemptive")) {
 *     return response.request().newBuilder()
 *         .header("Proxy-Authorization", "secret")
 *         .build();
 *   }
 * }
 * return null; // Didn't find a preemptive auth scheme.
 * ```
 *
 * ## Reactive Authentication
 *

    }
}
// end::digest-authentication[]

// tag::preemptive-authentication[]
repositories {
    maven {
        url 'https://repo.mycompany.com/maven2'
        credentials {
            username "user"
            password "password"
        }
        authentication {
            basic(BasicAuthentication)
        }
    }
}

const (
	CreatedContainer        = "Created"
	StartedContainer        = "Started"
	FailedToCreateContainer = "Failed"
	FailedToStartContainer  = "Failed"
	KillingContainer        = "Killing"
	PreemptContainer        = "Preempting"
	BackOffStartContainer   = "BackOff"
	ExceededGracePeriod     = "ExceededGracePeriod"
)

// Pod event reason list
const (
	FailedToKillPod                = "FailedKillPod"

}
// end::digest-authentication[]

// tag::preemptive-authentication[]
repositories {
    maven {
        url = uri("https://repo.mycompany.com/maven2")
        credentials {
            username = "user"
            password = "password"
        }
        authentication {
            create<BasicAuthentication>("basic")
        }
    }
}

 *
 *  * A DNS lookup failed
 *  * The configuration is incapable of carrying the request, such as when the client is configured
 *    to use `H2_PRIOR_KNOWLEDGE` but the URL's scheme is `https:`.
 *  * Preemptive proxy authentication failed.
 *
 * Planning failures are not necessarily fatal. For example, even if we can't DNS lookup the first
 * proxy in a list, looking up a subsequent one may succeed.
 */