cp >>>= 4;
      dest[4] = UPPER_HEX_DIGITS[0x8 | (cp & 0x3)];
      cp >>>= 2;
      dest[2] = UPPER_HEX_DIGITS[cp & 0x7];
      return dest;
    } else {
      // If this ever happens it is due to bug in UnicodeEscaper, not bad input.
      throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid unicode character value " + cp);
    }
  }

    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

 *       other tests. We want to exclude the other tests (which Android can't handle) while
 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?

 * views are modifiable.
 *
 * <p>This class is not threadsafe when any concurrent operations update the multimap. Concurrent
 * read operations will work correctly if the last write <i>happens-before</i> any reads. To allow
 * concurrent update operations, wrap your multimap with a call to {@link
 * Multimaps#synchronizedSetMultimap}.
 *

    maybePropagateCancellationTo(delegateRef);

    Future<?> localTimer = timer;
    // Try to cancel the timer as an optimization.
    // timer may be null if this call to run was by the timer task since there is no happens-before
    // edge between the assignment to timer and an execution of the timer task.
    if (localTimer != null) {
      localTimer.cancel(false);
    }

    delegateRef = null;
    timer = null;
  }

    Striped<Lock> stripedLock = Striped.lazyWeakLock(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      stripedLock.get(new Object()).lock();
      // nothing special (e.g. an exception) happens
    }
  }

  public void testBulkGetReturnsSorted() {
    for (Striped<?> striped : allImplementations()) {
      Map<Object, Integer> indexByLock = Maps.newHashMap();

    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages

    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages