if info.Person == nil {
			t.Fatalf("Failed, expected not nil, got person nil")
		}
		if info.Address == nil {
			t.Fatalf("Failed, expected not nil, got address nil")
		}
		if info.Person.ID == person1.ID {
			personMatched = true
			if info.Person.Name != person1.Name {
				t.Errorf("Failed, expected %v, got %v", person1.Name, info.Person.Name)
			}
		}

from .utils import needs_pydanticv1, needs_pydanticv2


class Person:
    def __init__(self, name: str):
        self.name = name


class Pet:
    def __init__(self, owner: Person, name: str):
        self.owner = owner
        self.name = name


@dataclass
class Item:
    name: str
    count: int


class DictablePerson(Person):
    def __iter__(self):

 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * public enum PersonFunnel implements Funnel<Person> {
 *   INSTANCE;
 *   public void funnel(Person person, PrimitiveSink into) {
 *     into.putUnencodedChars(person.getFirstName())
 *         .putUnencodedChars(person.getLastName())
 *         .putInt(person.getAge());
 *   }
 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @since 11.0
 */
@Beta

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2015 Spring, Inc.

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is

Dann verwenden wir den Request direkt und extrahieren den Body als `bytes`. Das bedeutet, dass FastAPI nicht einmal versucht, den Request-Payload als JSON zu parsen.

Und dann parsen wir in unserem Code diesen YAML-Inhalt direkt und verwenden dann wieder dasselbe Pydantic-Modell, um den YAML-Inhalt zu validieren:

=== "Pydantic v2"

    ```Python hl_lines="26-33"

### Das Problem reproduzieren

In den meisten Fällen und bei den meisten Fragen ist etwas mit dem von der Person erstellten **eigenen Quellcode** los.

In vielen Fällen wird nur ein Fragment des Codes gepostet, aber das reicht nicht aus, um **das Problem zu reproduzieren**.

        assertWithMessage("Pearson's correlation coefficient of " + values)
            .that(pearsonsCorrelationCoefficient)
            .isNaN();
        assertWithMessage("Pearson's correlation coefficient by addAll(PairedStats) of " + values)
            .that(pearsonsCorrelationCoefficient)
            .isNaN();
      } else {
        assertWithMessage("Pearson's correlation coefficient of " + values)

        assertWithMessage("Pearson's correlation coefficient of " + values)
            .that(pearsonsCorrelationCoefficient)
            .isNaN();
        assertWithMessage("Pearson's correlation coefficient by addAll(PairedStats) of " + values)
            .that(pearsonsCorrelationCoefficient)
            .isNaN();
      } else {
        assertWithMessage("Pearson's correlation coefficient of " + values)

    String jacksons =
        "arfo(Marlon)aorf, (Michael)orfa, afro(Jackie)orfa, " + "ofar(Jemaine), aff(Tito)";
    Iterable<String> family =
        COMMA_SPLITTER
            .trimResults(CharMatcher.anyOf("afro").or(CharMatcher.whitespace()))
            .split(jacksons);
    assertThat(family)
        .containsExactly("(Marlon)", "(Michael)", "(Jackie)", "(Jemaine)", "(Tito)")
        .inOrder();
  }

func TestMultipleMany2Many(t *testing.T) {
	type Thing struct {
		ID int
	}

	type Person struct {
		ID       int
		Likes    []Thing `gorm:"many2many:likes"`
		Dislikes []Thing `gorm:"many2many:dislikes"`
	}

	checkStructRelation(t, &Person{},
		Relation{
			Name: "Likes", Type: schema.Many2Many, Schema: "Person", FieldSchema: "Thing",
			JoinTable: JoinTable{Name: "likes", Table: "likes"},