* <i>missing</i> information and the other is not. The {@link #convert} method handles this null
 * behavior for all converters; implementations of {@link #doForward} and {@link #doBackward} are
 * guaranteed to never be passed {@code null}, and must never return {@code null}.
 *
 * <h3>Common ways to use</h3>
 *
 * <p>Getting a converter:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Use a provided converter implementation, such as {@link Enums#stringConverter}, {@link

# Each automation is independent of the others.  Every time one of the `on` conditions match for
# this PR, this automations will have its `if` checked to run.  In a way, the `on` conditions
# function as an implicit first `if` for every automation in the file.

# You can define multiple automations in a .cm file, but each automation name should be unique
# within the file.  We keep each automation (or very closely related group of automations) in

 *       {@code AsyncCallable}) to complete, without interrupting it (and without calling {@code
 *       cancel} on the {@code Future}). So beware: <i>Even if you cancel every preceding {@code
 *       Future} returned by this class, the next task may still have to wait.</i>.
 *   <li>Once an {@code AsyncCallable} returns a {@code Future}, this class considers that task to

     * Level#SEVERE} message indicating the potential deadlock, which includes stack traces
     * illustrating the cycle in lock acquisition order.
     */
    WARN {
      @Override
      public void handlePotentialDeadlock(PotentialDeadlockException e) {
        logger.get().log(Level.SEVERE, "Detected potential deadlock", e);
      }
    },

    /**

* Be very, very careful.
* The cache has a builtin test, enabled with `UNSAFE_PILOT_ENABLE_RUNTIME_ASSERTIONS=true`, that runs in CI. This will panic if any key is written to with a different value.

#### Partial Computations

# Each automation is independent of the others.  Every time one of the `on` conditions match for
# this PR, this automations will have its `if` checked to run.  In a way, the `on` conditions
# function as an implicit first `if` for every automation in the file.

# You can define multiple automations in a .cm file, but each automation name should be unique
# within the file.  We keep each automation (or very closely related group of automations) in

    // launched by this test is either:
    //
    // (a) Blocked attempting to enter the monitor.
    // (b) Waiting for the single guard to become satisfied.
    // (c) Occupying the monitor and awaiting the tearDownLatch.
    //
    // Except for (c), every thread should occupy the monitor very briefly, and every thread leaves

They are, more or less, at opposite ends, complementing each other.

Requests has a very simple and intuitive design, it's very easy to use, with sensible defaults. But at the same time, it's very powerful and customizable.

That's why, as said in the official website:

> Requests is one of the most downloaded Python packages of all time

The way you use it is very simple. For example, to do a `GET` request, you would write:

```Python

# Each automation is independent of the others.  Every time one of the `on` conditions match for
# this PR, this automations will have its `if` checked to run.  In a way, the `on` conditions
# function as an implicit first `if` for every automation in the file.

# You can define multiple automations in a .cm file, but each automation name should be unique
# within the file.  We keep each automation (or very closely related group of automations) in

    // launched by this test is either:
    //
    // (a) Blocked attempting to enter the monitor.
    // (b) Waiting for the single guard to become satisfied.
    // (c) Occupying the monitor and awaiting the tearDownLatch.
    //
    // Except for (c), every thread should occupy the monitor very briefly, and every thread leaves