<img src="/img/deployment/https/https05.svg">

### HTTP-Response

Die Anwendung würde den Request verarbeiten und eine **einfache (unverschlüsselte) HTTP-Response** an den TLS-Terminierungsproxy senden.

<img src="/img/deployment/https/https06.svg">

### HTTPS-Response

import org.codelibs.fess.app.web.api.ApiResult;
import org.codelibs.fess.app.web.api.admin.FessApiAdminAction;
import org.lastaflute.web.Execute;
import org.lastaflute.web.response.JsonResponse;
import org.lastaflute.web.response.StreamResponse;

/**
 * @author Keiichi Watanabe
 */
public class ApiAdminLogAction extends FessApiAdminAction {

```
$ adb logcat '*:E' OkHttp:D Http2:D TestRunner:D TaskRunner:D OkHttpTest:D GnssHAL_GnssInterface:F DeviceStateChecker:F memtrack:F
...
01-01 12:53:32.811 10999 11089 D OkHttp  : [49 ms] responseHeadersEnd: Response{protocol=h2, code=200, message=, url=https://1.1.1.1/dns-query?dns=AAABAAABAAAAAAAAA3d3dwhmYWNlYm9vawNjb20AABwAAQ}
01-01 12:53:32.811 10999 11089 D OkHttp  : [49 ms] responseBodyStart

System.out.println("REQUEST 1 (new connection)");
try (Response response = client.newCall(request).execute()) {
  // Consume and discard the response body.
  response.body().source().readByteString();
}

System.out.println("REQUEST 2 (pooled connection)");
try (Response response = client.newCall(request).execute()) {
  // Consume and discard the response body.
  response.body().source().readByteString();
}
```

from starlette.responses import JSONResponse, Response
from starlette.status import HTTP_422_UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY, WS_1008_POLICY_VIOLATION


async def http_exception_handler(request: Request, exc: HTTPException) -> Response:
    headers = getattr(exc, "headers", None)
    if not is_body_allowed_for_status_code(exc.status_code):
        return Response(status_code=exc.status_code, headers=headers)
    return JSONResponse(

        raise fastapi.exceptions.FastAPIError(
            "Invalid args for response field! Hint: "
            f"check that {type_} is a valid Pydantic field type. "
            "If you are using a return type annotation that is not a valid Pydantic "
            "field (e.g. Union[Response, dict, None]) you can disable generating the "
            "response model from the type annotation with the path operation decorator "

```Python hl_lines="11"
{!../../docs_src/handling_errors/tutorial001.py!}
```

### Die resultierende Response

Wenn der Client `http://example.com/items/foo` anfragt (ein `item_id` `"foo"`), erhält dieser Client einen HTTP-Statuscode 200 und folgende JSON-Response:

```JSON
{
  "item": "The Foo Wrestlers"
}
```

        final RefreshResponse response = searchEngineClient.admin().indices().prepareRefresh(index).execute().actionGet();
        if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
            logger.debug("[{}] refresh status: {} ({}/{}/{})", index, response.getStatus(), response.getTotalShards(),
                    response.getSuccessfulShards(), response.getFailedShards());
        }
        return response.getStatus().getStatus();
    }

         * with everything else. If the below clause evaluates true
         * the andx command will not be written and therefore the
         * response will not read a batched command and therefore
         * the 'received' member of the response object will not
         * be set to true indicating the send and sendTransaction
         * methods that the next part should be sent. This is a

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.