Se você quiser proteger sua API, há várias coisas melhores que você pode fazer, por exemplo:

* Certifique-se de ter modelos Pydantic bem definidos para seus corpos de solicitação e respostas.
* Configure quaisquer permissões e funções necessárias usando dependências.

                extractFile(ent.getKey(), embeddedFile, writer);
            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Gets the embedded file from a file specification, trying different platform-specific variants.
     * @param fileSpec the file specification
     * @return the embedded file, or null if not found
     */
    protected PDEmbeddedFile getEmbeddedFile(final PDComplexFileSpecification fileSpec) {

arcfour256
arcfour128
arcfour
aes128-cbc
3des-cbc
```

`--sftp=mac-algos=...` specifies a default set of MAC algorithms in preference order.
This is based on RFC 4253, section 6.4, but with hmac-md5 variants removed because they have 
reached the end of their useful life.

Valid values: 

```
******@****.***
******@****.***
hmac-sha2-256
hmac-sha2-512
hmac-sha1

## Documentando o callback

O código real do callback dependerá muito do seu próprio aplicativo de API.

E provavelmente variará muito de um aplicativo para o outro.

Poderia ser apenas uma ou duas linhas de código, como:

```Python
callback_url = "https://example.com/api/v1/invoices/events/"

    UnmodifiableTable(Table<? extends R, ? extends C, ? extends V> delegate) {
      this.delegate = checkNotNull(delegate);
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // safe, covariant cast
    @Override
    protected Table<R, C, V> delegate() {
      return (Table<R, C, V>) delegate;
    }

    @Override
    public Set<Cell<R, C, V>> cellSet() {

<img src="/img/tutorial/path-operation-configuration/image01.png">

### Tags con Enums

Si tienes una gran aplicación, podrías terminar acumulando **varias tags**, y querrías asegurarte de que siempre uses la **misma tag** para *path operations* relacionadas.

En estos casos, podría tener sentido almacenar las tags en un `Enum`.

   */
  public static <E> ImmutableList<E> copyOf(Collection<? extends E> elements) {
    if (elements instanceof ImmutableCollection) {
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // all supported methods are covariant
      ImmutableList<E> list = ((ImmutableCollection<E>) elements).asList();
      return list.isPartialView() ? ImmutableList.<E>asImmutableList(list.toArray()) : list;
    }
    return construct(elements.toArray());

    if (map instanceof ImmutableClassToInstanceMap) {
      @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // JDT-based J2KT Java frontend does not permit the direct cast
      Map rawMap = map;
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // covariant casts safe (unmodifiable)
      ImmutableClassToInstanceMap<B> cast = (ImmutableClassToInstanceMap<B>) rawMap;
      return cast;
    }
    return new Builder<B>().putAll(map).build();
  }

  protected Entry<K, V> entry(K key, V value) {
    return mapEntry(key, value);
  }

  @Override
  protected void expectContents(Collection<Entry<K, V>> expected) {
    // TODO: move this to invariant checks once the appropriate hook exists?
    super.expectContents(expected);
    for (Entry<K, V> entry : expected) {
      assertEquals(

Sie führen die Funktion ohne den benötigten Parameter aus, dann wird Ihr **Editor** Sie das mit einem Fehler wissen lassen, und **Python** wird sich auch beschweren.

Wenn Sie aber nicht `Annotated` benutzen und stattdessen die **(alte) Variante mit einem Defaultwert**, dann müssen Sie, wenn Sie die Funktion ohne FastAPI an **anderen Stellen** aufrufen, sich daran **erinnern**, die Argumente der Funktion zu übergeben, damit es richtig funktioniert. Ansonsten erhalten Sie unerwartete Werte...