response = client.put(
        "/items/123",
        json={"name": "Foo", "price": 50.1, "description": "Some Foo", "tax": 0.3},
        params={"q": "somequery"},
    )
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {
        "item_id": 123,
        "name": "Foo",
        "price": 50.1,
        "description": "Some Foo",
        "tax": 0.3,
        "q": "somequery",
    }

        List<Artifact> artifacts = new ArrayList<Artifact>();

        Artifact artifact = mock(Artifact.class);
        when(artifact.getFile()).thenReturn(new File(new File("local/repository"), "some/path"));
        when(artifact.getGroupId()).thenReturn("group1");
        when(artifact.getArtifactId()).thenReturn("artifact1");
        when(artifact.getExtension()).thenReturn("ext");

        assertFalse(result.getContent().isEmpty());
    }

    /**
     * Test that ZipExtractor handles mixed valid and invalid entries gracefully.
     * Should continue processing valid entries even when some fail.
     */
    public void test_ZipExtractor_mixedEntries_continuesProcessing() throws IOException {
        // Create a ZIP with one valid text file
        final ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();

                "price": 50.5,
                "description": "Some Foo",
                "tax": 0.1,
            },
        },
    )
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {
        "item_id": 5,
        "item": {
            "name": "Foo",
            "price": 50.5,
            "description": "Some Foo",
            "tax": 0.1,
        },
    }

**FastAPI** provides several tools to help you deal with **Security** easily, rapidly, in a standard way, without having to study and learn all the security specifications.

But first, let's check some small concepts.

## In a hurry? { #in-a-hurry }

If you don't care about any of these terms and you just need to add security with authentication based on username and password *right now*, skip to the next chapters.

       *
       * TODO(b/112550045): Allocating a single, cheaper listener is (I think) only an optimization.
       * If we make some other optimizations, this one will no longer be necessary. The optimization
       * could actually hurt in some cases, as it forces us to keep all inputs in memory until the
       * final input completes.
       */
      @RetainedLocalRef

    if log.is_file():
        os.remove(log)  # pragma: no cover
    response = client.post("/send-notification/******@****.***?q=some-query")
    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert response.json() == {"message": "Message sent"}
    with open("./log.txt") as f:

    @Test
    public void testReset() throws Exception {
        // Create some state
        String username = "resettest";
        String ip = "192.168.1.12";

        for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
            rateLimiter.checkAttempt(username, ip);
            rateLimiter.recordFailure(username, ip);
        }

        // Should have some state

    @app.get("/", response_model=ModelWithRef)
    async def read_root() -> Any:
        return {"$ref": "some-ref"}

    client = TestClient(app)
    return client


def test_get(client: TestClient):
    response = client.get("/")
    assert response.json() == {"$ref": "some-ref"}


def test_openapi_schema(client: TestClient):
    response = client.get("openapi.json")

Dans ce cadre, j'ai dû étudier, tester et utiliser de nombreuses alternatives.

L'histoire de **FastAPI** est en grande partie l'histoire de ses prédécesseurs.

Comme dit dans la section [Alternatives](alternatives.md){.internal-link target=\_blank} :

<blockquote markdown="1">

**FastAPI** n'existerait pas sans le travail antérieur d'autres personnes.