elements.add(null);
    collection = getSubjectGenerator().create(elements.toArray());
    assertEquals(
        "A Set's hashCode() should be the sum of those of its elements (with "
            + "a null element counting as having a hash of zero).",
        expectedHashCode,
        getSet().hashCode());
  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@link Method} instances for the test methods in this class which call {@code

    }

    resetContainer(getSubjectGenerator().create(entries.toArray()));
    assertEquals(
        "A Map's hashCode() should be the sum of those of its entries (where "
            + "a null element in an entry counts as having a hash of zero).",
        expectedHashCode,
        getMap().hashCode());
  }

  private static int hash(Entry<?, ?> e) {
    return (e.getKey() == null ? 0 : e.getKey().hashCode())

in handling your report.

Please, provide a detailed explanation of the issue. In particular, outline the type of the security
issue (DoS, authentication bypass, information disclose, ...) and the assumptions you're making (e.g. do
you need access credentials for a successful exploit).

If you have not received a reply to your email within 48 hours or you have not heard from the security team

        // reset config
        config.setDefaultDispatcher(null);
        config.getConfigurations().clear();

        Map<String, PromptResultItemIF> dispatcherResult;
        Map<String, PromptResultItemIF> dispatcherConfigResult;
        Map<String, PromptResultItemIF> confirmChoice;
        ConsolePrompt prompt = new ConsolePrompt(context.reader, context.terminal, promptConfig);

### Breaking Changes


`tf.keras`:

   * with underutilization, then we want stored permits to be given out /faster/ than fresh ones,
   * because underutilization = free resources for the taking. If we are primarily interested to
   * deal with overflow, then stored permits could be given out /slower/ than fresh ones. Thus, we
   * require a (different in each case) function that translates storedPermits to throttling time.

  private final Set<Type> visited = new HashSet<>();

  /**
   * Visits the given types. Null types are ignored. This allows subclasses to call {@code
   * visit(parameterizedType.getOwnerType())} safely without having to check nulls.
   */
  public final void visit(@Nullable Type... types) {
    for (Type type : types) {
      if (type == null || !visited.add(type)) {
        // null owner type, or already visited;
        continue;

It also re-declares `id: int`. By doing this, we are making a **contract** with the API clients, so that they can always expect the `id` to be there and to be an `int` (it will never be `None`).

/// tip

Having the return model ensure that a value is always available and always `int` (not `None`) is very useful for the API clients, they can write much simpler code having this certainty.

  private final boolean allowNulls;

  // Package-private so that it can be extended.
  MinimalCollection(Class<? super @NonNull E> type, boolean allowNulls, E... contents) {
    // TODO: consider making it shuffle the contents to test iteration order.
    this.contents = Platform.clone(contents);
    this.type = type;
    this.allowNulls = allowNulls;

    if (!allowNulls) {
      for (Object element : contents) {

 * <i>other type</i> of supplier is expected, use the method reference {@code supplier::get}. A
 * future version of {@code com.google.common.base.Supplier} will be made to <i>extend</i> {@code
 * java.util.function.Supplier}, making conversion code necessary only in one direction. At that
 * time, this interface will be officially discouraged.
 *
 * @author Harry Heymann
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible