}

  // Graph mutation methods

  // Graph view methods

  /**
   * Returns a view of {@code graph} with the direction (if any) of every edge reversed. All other
   * properties remain intact, and further updates to {@code graph} will be reflected in the view.
   */
  public static <N> Graph<N> transpose(Graph<N> graph) {
    if (!graph.isDirected()) {

  }

  // Graph mutation methods

  // Graph view methods

  /**
   * Returns a view of {@code graph} with the direction (if any) of every edge reversed. All other
   * properties remain intact, and further updates to {@code graph} will be reflected in the view.
   */
  public static <N> Graph<N> transpose(Graph<N> graph) {
    if (!graph.isDirected()) {

            // This is consistent with the actual implementation behavior
            // The reserved bytes remain as they were in the buffer
            for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
                assertEquals((byte) 0xFF, buffer[startIndex + SOURCE_KEY_SIZE + 4 + i],
                        "Reserved byte at position " + i + " should remain unchanged");
            }
        }

        @Test

        if (dstIndex + this.dataLength > dst.length) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException(
                    String.format("Data exceeds buffer size ( remain buffer: %d data length: %d)", dst.length - dstIndex, this.dataLength));
        }

        System.arraycopy(this.data, this.dataOffset, dst, dstIndex, this.dataLength);
        dstIndex += this.dataLength;

useful?

Erasure code protects data from multiple drives failure, unlike RAID or replication. For example, RAID6 can protect against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects...

    assertEquals("string with spaces", spaceEscaper.escape("string with spaces"));
  }

  /** Tests that if we add extra 'safe' characters they remain unescaped */
  public void testCustomEscaper() {
    UnicodeEscaper e = new PercentEscaper("+*/-", false);
    for (char c = 0; c < 128; c++) {
      if ((c >= '0' && c <= '9')
          || (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z')

  // Modification Operations

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the given value is already bound to a different key in this
   *     bimap. The bimap will remain unmodified in this event. To avoid this exception, call {@link
   *     #forcePut} instead.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  @Nullable V put(@ParametricNullness K key, @ParametricNullness V value);

  /**

        request.addHeader("Host", "example.com");
        result = virtualHostHelper.getVirtualHostPath(page);
        assertEquals("/site1/search", result.getRoutingPath());

        // The header remains for subsequent tests due to static request handling
        // Different matching header added to same request
        request.addHeader("X-Forwarded-Host", "test.com");
        result = virtualHostHelper.getVirtualHostPath(page);

        // Read one byte to trigger message header processing
        assertEquals(1, sis.read());

        // 3 bytes should remain available in current message
        assertEquals(3, sis.available());

        // Read another byte
        assertEquals(2, sis.read());

        // 2 bytes should remain
        assertEquals(2, sis.available());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Multiple messages are read sequentially")

        authenticator.secureWipePassword();
        authenticator.secureWipePassword();
        authenticator.secureWipePassword();

        assertNull(authenticator.getPassword(), "Password should remain null after multiple wipes");
    }