* set of the empty set is not the empty set, but a one-element set containing the empty set.
   *
   * <p>The returned set and its constituent sets use {@code equals} to decide whether two elements
   * are identical, even if the input set uses a different concept of equivalence.
   *
   * <p><i>Performance notes:</i> while the power set of a set with size {@code n} is of size {@code

  }

  private static <T extends @Nullable Object> void successor(
      AvlNode<T> a, AvlNode<T> b, AvlNode<T> c) {
    successor(a, b);
    successor(b, c);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(jlevy): Decide whether entrySet() should return entries with an equals() method that
   * calls the comparator to compare the two keys. If that change is made,

  }

  private static <T extends @Nullable Object> void successor(
      AvlNode<T> a, AvlNode<T> b, AvlNode<T> c) {
    successor(a, b);
    successor(b, c);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(jlevy): Decide whether entrySet() should return entries with an equals() method that
   * calls the comparator to compare the two keys. If that change is made,

			markDelete = false
		}
		if opts.VersionPurgeStatus() == replication.VersionPurgeComplete {
			markDelete = false
		}
		// now, since VersionPurgeStatus() is already set, we can let the
		// lower layers decide this. This fixes a regression that was introduced
		// in PR #14555 where !VersionPurgeStatus.Empty() is automatically
		// considered as Delete marker true to avoid listing such objects by

    }
    assertNull(map.get(unmappedKey));
  }

  public void testGetNull() {
    Map<K, V> map = makeEitherMap();
    if (allowsNullKeys) {
      if (allowsNullValues) {
        // TODO: decide what to test here.
      } else {
        assertEquals(map.containsKey(null), map.get(null) != null);
      }
    } else {
      try {
        V unused = map.get(null);

     * {@code profile > project}, hence active profile property may override project property.
     * <p>
     * The caller of this method should decide whether there is a project in scope (hence, a project instance
     * needs to be passed) or not.
     *
     * @param project {@link Project} or {@code null}.
     * @return the effective properties, never {@code null}

Then, when it's your turn, you do actual "productive" work, you process the menu, decide what you want, get your crush's choice, pay, check that you give the correct bill or card, check that you are charged correctly, check that the order has the correct items, etc.

---

The main point is, **none** of these are **rules written in stone** that you have to blindly follow. You can use these ideas to **evaluate your own use case** and decide what is the best approach for your system, checking out how to manage the concepts of:

* Security - HTTPS
* Running on startup
* Restarts
* Replication (the number of processes running)
* Memory

Foundation.  If the Program does not specify a version number of the
GNU Affero General Public License, you may choose any version ever published
by the Free Software Foundation.

  If the Program specifies that a proxy can decide which future
versions of the GNU Affero General Public License can be used, that proxy's
public statement of acceptance of a version permanently authorizes you
to choose that version for the Program.

         * element anymore. Otherwise, when we remove from the old iterator, we may be invalidating
         * the new one. The result is a ConcurrentModificationException or other bad behavior.
         *
         * (If we decide that we really, really hate allocating two Iterators per cycle instead of
         * one, we can optimistically store the new Iterator and then be willing to throw it out if
         * the user calls remove().)
         */