Especificamente, observa-se Uvicorn, Starlette e FastAPI comparados juntos (entre muitas outras ferramentas).

Quanto mais simples o problema resolvido pela ferramenta, melhor a performance que ela terá. E a maioria dos _benchmarks_ não testam as características adicionais fornecidas pela ferramenta.

A hierarquia segue assim:

* **Uvicorn**: um servidor ASGI
    * **Starlette**: (utiliza Uvicorn) um _microframework web_

#  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
#  limitations under the License.
#

# https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/syntax-for-githubs-form-schema

name: Feature request
description: File a proposal for new feature, improvement
labels: ["enhancement"]

body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |

/// info | Informação

Se você já sabe sobre ambientes virtuais, como criá-los e usá-los, talvez seja melhor pular esta seção. 🤓

///

/// tip | Dica

Um **ambiente virtual** é diferente de uma **variável de ambiente**.

Uma **variável de ambiente** é uma variável no sistema que pode ser usada por programas.

name: Feedback

on:
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 * * * *' # every hour
  workflow_dispatch:

permissions: {}

jobs:
  feedback:
    permissions:
      issues: write
      pull-requests: write
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      # Feedback loop: ask for something on PR/Issue and close if not provided or return to the queue on update.
      # https://github.com/gradle/issue-management-action/blob/main/src/feedback.ts

name: golangci-lint
on:
  push:
    branches:
      - main
      - master
  pull_request:

permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: read

jobs:
  golangci:
    name: lint
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-go@v5
        with:
          go-version: stable
      - name: golangci-lint
        uses: golangci/golangci-lint-action@v7

jobs:
  main:
    permissions:
      contents: read
      pull-requests: write
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Check if PRs have merge conflicts
        uses: eps1lon/actions-label-merge-conflict@v3
        with:
          dirtyLabel: "conflicts"
          repoToken: "${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}"

# MinIO Pull Request Guidelines

These guidelines ensure high-quality commits in MinIO’s GitHub repositories, maintaining 
a clear, valuable commit history for our open-source projects. They apply to all contributors, 
fostering efficient reviews and robust code.

## Why Pull Requests?

Pull Requests (PRs) drive quality in MinIO’s codebase by:
- Enabling peer review without pair programming.
- Documenting changes for future reference.

    directory: "/"
    schedule:
      interval: "daily"
    labels:
      - "@dev-productivity"
      - "a:chore"
      - "in:building-gradle"
  - package-ecosystem: "gradle"
    open-pull-requests-limit: 0
    directory: "/"
    schedule:
      interval: "daily"
    labels:
      - "@dev-productivity"
      - "a:chore"

- [ ] Check ["Allow edit from maintainers" option](https://help.github.com/articles/allowing-changes-to-a-pull-request-branch-created-from-a-fork/) in pull request so that additional changes can be pushed by Gradle team.
- [ ] Provide integration tests (under `<subproject>/src/integTest`) to verify changes from a user perspective.

        .permitAll()
        .build(),
    )
  }

  @Test
  fun testInit() {
    Platform.resetForTests()

    applyStrictMode()

    // Not currently safe
    // See https://github.com/square/okhttp/pull/8248
    OkHttpClient()

    assertThat(violations).hasSize(1)
    assertThat(violations[0].message).isEqualTo("newSSLContext")
  }

  @Test
  fun testNewCall() {
    Platform.resetForTests()