*
 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code java.util.HashSet}.
 * Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory consumption at the price of
 * moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class when there is a specific reason
 * to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @author Jon Noack
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now

    final ImmutableList<E> inputList;

    PermutationCollection(ImmutableList<E> input) {
      this.inputList = input;
    }

    @Override
    public int size() {
      return IntMath.factorial(inputList.size());
    }

    @Override
    public boolean isEmpty() {
      return false;
    }

    @Override
    public Iterator<List<E>> iterator() {

 *
 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code java.util.HashMap}.
 * Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory consumption at the price of
 * moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class when there is a specific reason
 * to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @author Jon Noack
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now

 *
 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code java.util.HashMap}.
 * Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory consumption at the price of
 * moderately increased constant factors of CPU. Only use this class when there is a specific reason
 * to prioritize memory over CPU.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @author Jon Noack
 */
@GwtIncompatible // not worth using in GWT for now

   *    throw new BadException(badMsg(...));
   * }
   *
   * The alternative natural refactorings into void or Exception-returning methods are much slower.
   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *

   *    throw new BadException(badMsg(...));
   * }
   *
   * The alternative natural refactorings into void or Exception-returning methods are much slower.
   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *

</li>

<li>
<code>64(DI)(BX*2)</code>: The location at address <code>DI</code> plus <code>BX*2</code> plus 64.
These modes accept only 1, 2, 4, and 8 as scale factors.
</li>

</ul>

<p>
When using the compiler and assembler's
<code>-dynlink</code> or <code>-shared</code> modes,
any load or store of a fixed memory location such as a global variable

        }
        return "\\\\" + url.getHost() + canon.replace('/', '\\');
    }

    /**
     * Returns the full URL of this SMB resource with '.' and '..' components
     * factored out. An <code>SmbFile</code> constructed with the result of
     * this method will result in an <code>SmbFile</code> that is equal to
     * the original.
     *

        } catch (final CIFSException e) {
            throw SmbException.wrap(e);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Returns the full URL of this SMB resource with '.' and '..' components
     * factored out. An <code>SmbFile</code> constructed with the result of
     * this method will result in an <code>SmbFile</code> that is equal to
     * the original.
     *

            <p>This flexible condition mechanism allows for more precise control over profile
            activation, enabling developers to create profiles that respond to a wide range of
            environmental factors and project states.</p>
       ]]></description>
      <fields>
        <field>
          <name>activeByDefault</name>
          <version>4.0.0+</version>
          <type>boolean</type>