*/
@Suppress("NAME_SHADOWING")
class CertificatePinner internal constructor(
  val pins: Set<Pin>,
  internal val certificateChainCleaner: CertificateChainCleaner? = null,
) {
  /**
   * Confirms that at least one of the certificates pinned for `hostname` is in `peerCertificates`.
   * Does nothing if there are no certificates pinned for `hostname`. OkHttp calls this after a

        .build()
    val certificate = heldCertificate.certificate
    assertThat(certificate.getSubjectX500Principal().name).isEqualTo(
      "CN=cash.app,OU=cash",
    )
  }

  /** Confirm golden values of encoded PEMs.  */
  @Test
  fun pems() {
    val keyFactory = KeyFactory.getInstance("RSA")
    val publicKeyBytes =
      (

## Merge Translation PRs

For Spanish, as I'm a native speaker and it's a language close to me, I will give it a final review myself and in most cases tweak the PR a bit before merging it.

For the other languages, confirm that:

* The title is correct following the instructions above.
* It has the labels `lang-all` and `lang-{lang code}`.
* The PR changes only one Markdown file adding a translation.

    val parts =
      MultipartReader(
        boundary = "simple boundary",
        source = Buffer(),
      )

    assertFailsWith<EOFException> {
      parts.nextPart()
    }
  }

  /** Confirm that [MultipartBody] and [MultipartReader] can work together. */
  @Test fun `multipart round trip`() {
    val body =
      MultipartBody
        .Builder("boundary")
        .setType(MultipartBody.PARALLEL)

Mas o OAuth2 com escopos pode ser integrado de maneira fácil em sua API (com OpenAPI) e a sua documentação de API.

No entando, você ainda aplica estes escopos, ou qualquer outro requisito de segurança/autorização, conforme necessário, em seu código.

Em muitos casos, OAuth2 com escopos pode ser um exagero.

Mas se você sabe que precisa, ou está curioso, continue lendo.

///

## Escopos OAuth2 e OpenAPI

ame:"spamcheck",validatorFunction:function(a,b){var c=b.valAttr("captcha");return c===a},errorMessage:"",errorMessageKey:"badSecurityAnswer"}),a.formUtils.addValidator({name:"confirmation",validatorFunction:function(b,c,d,e,f){var g,h=c.valAttr("confirm")||c.attr("name")+"_confirmation",i=f.find('[name="'+h+'"]');if(!i.length)return a.formUtils.warn('Password confirmation validator: could not find an input with name "'+h+'"',!0),!1;if(g=i.val(),d.validateOnBlur&&!i[0].hasValidationCallback){i[0]...

   * The following methods are safe to call as long as both of the following hold:
   *
   * - allocArrays() has been called. Callers can confirm this by checking needsAllocArrays().
   *
   * - The map has not switched to delegating to a java.util implementation to mitigate hash
   *   flooding. Callers can confirm this by null-checking delegateOrNull().
   *

    assertThat(request.tag(UUID::class.java)).isSameAs(uuidTag)
    assertThat(request.tag(String::class.java)).isSameAs(stringTag)
    assertThat(request.tag(Long::class.javaObjectType)).isSameAs(longTag)
  }

  /** Confirm that we don't accidentally share the backing map between objects. */
  @Test
  fun tagsAreImmutable() {
    val builder =
      Request
        .Builder()
        .url("https://square.com")

     * for the field accesses in MapIteratorCache. This test *has* found other TSAN errors,
     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {
      future.get();
    }

            }
            form.start = (pageNumber - 1) * form.getPageSize();
        }
        return doSearch(form);
    }

    // -----------------------------------------------------
    // Confirm
    // -------

    /**
     * Deletes a single document from the search index.
     *
     * @param form the delete form containing document ID
     * @return HTML response redirecting to the list page