# Using TensorFlow Securely

This document discusses the TensorFlow security model. It describes the security
risks to consider when using models, checkpoints or input data for training or
serving. We also provide guidelines on what constitutes a vulnerability in
TensorFlow and how to report them.

This document applies to other repositories in the TensorFlow organization,
covering security practices for the entirety of the TensorFlow ecosystem.

An example could be that you have an external authentication provider that you need to call.

You send it a token and it returns an authenticated user.

This provider might be charging you per request, and calling it might take some extra time than if you had a fixed mock user for tests.

You probably want to test the external provider once, but not necessarily call it for every test that runs.

         * All you need is a good internet connection and you are all set.
      * Try to build TF from sources by changing CPU optimization flags.
   
   *Please let us know if this helps.*
   
windows_comment: >
   From the stack trace it looks like you are hitting windows path length limit.

package cmd

import (
	"runtime"
	"testing"
	"time"
)

// WARNING:
//
// Expected source line number is hard coded, 35, in the
// following test. Adding new code before this test or changing its
// position will cause the line number to change and the test to FAIL
// Tests getSource().
func TestGetSource(t *testing.T) {
	currentSource := func() string { return getSource(2) }
	gotSource := currentSource()

        assertNull(emptyGenerator.getName());

        // Test after setting name
        emptyGenerator.setName("testGenerator");
        assertEquals("testGenerator", emptyGenerator.getName());

        // Test changing name
        emptyGenerator.setName("newName");
        assertEquals("newName", emptyGenerator.getName());
    }

    public void test_addCondition() {
        // Initialize without container

 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link
 * IteratorTester#newTargetIterator()} method. This is because it's impossible to test an Iterator
 * without changing its state, so the tester needs a steady supply of fresh Iterators.
 *
 * <p>If your iterator supports modification through {@code remove()}, you may wish to override the

import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.MockedStatic;
import org.mockito.junit.jupiter.MockitoExtension;

import jcifs.smb1.UniAddress;

/**
 * Very small test suite that exercises the most important state-changing
 * behaviour of {@link SmbSession}. The tests use Mockito to stub the
 * heavy network interactions through {@link SmbTransport}.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
public class SmbSessionTest {

    @Mock

      security-events: write  # for github/codeql-action/analyze to upload SARIF results
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    strategy:
      fail-fast: false
      matrix:
        # Override automatic language detection by changing the below list
        # Supported options are ['csharp', 'cpp', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'python']
        language: ['java', 'javascript']
        # Learn more...

    # o isSuppressBatchUpdate: (NotRequired - Default false)
    #  Does it suppress batch update at loading data?
    #  When you have a data error, you may get details for the error
    #  by this property changing. Because it is possible that
    #  the BatchUpdateException information is very short for debug.
    #
    #; isSuppressBatchUpdate = false
    # - - - - - - - - - -/

are working on. And as mentioned above, API changes should be discussed
thoroughly before moving to code.

Some examples of types of pull requests that are immediately helpful:

  - Fixing a bug without changing a public API.
  - Fixing or improving documentation.
  - Improvements to Maven configuration.

Guidelines for any code contributions:

  1. Any significant changes should be accompanied by tests. The project already