- [Node Binaries](#node-binaries-1)
    - [Container Images](#container-images-1)
  - [Changelog since v1.25.14](#changelog-since-v12514)
  - [Changes by Kind](#changes-by-kind)
    - [Feature](#feature)
    - [Bug or Regression](#bug-or-regression)
    - [Other (Cleanup or Flake)](#other-cleanup-or-flake)
  - [Dependencies](#dependencies-1)
    - [Added](#added-1)
    - [Changed](#changed-1)
    - [Removed](#removed-1)
- [v1.25.14](#v12514)

./mc version suspend sitea/delissue --insecure

./mc rm sitea/delissue/hello --insecure

count=$(./mc ls --versions sitea/delissue --insecure | wc -l)

if [ ${count} -ne 3 ]; then
	echo "BUG: expected number of versions to be '3' found ${count}"
	echo "===== DEBUG ====="
	./mc ls --versions sitea/delissue
fi

./mc mb sitea/testbucket

./mc version enable sitea/testbucket

	echo "Hello World" | ./mc pipe sitea/bucket/obj$loop_count
	./mc rm sitea/bucket/obj$loop_count
	RESULT=$({ ./mc stat --no-list sitea/bucket/obj$loop_count; } 2>&1)
	if [[ ${RESULT} != *"Object does not exist"* ]]; then
		echo "BUG: stat should fail. succeeded."
		exit_1
	fi
	loop_count=$((loop_count + 1))
done

## About versions { #about-versions }

Following the Semantic Versioning conventions, any version below `1.0.0` could potentially add breaking changes.

FastAPI also follows the convention that any "PATCH" version change is for bug fixes and non-breaking changes.

/// tip

The "PATCH" is the last number, for example, in `0.2.3`, the PATCH version is `3`.

///

So, you should be able to pin to a version like:

```txt

start by opening a new issue describing the bug or feature you're intending to
fix. Even if you think it's relatively minor, it's helpful to know what people
are working on. And as mentioned above, API changes should be discussed
thoroughly before moving to code.

Some examples of types of pull requests that are immediately helpful:

  - Fixing a bug without changing a public API.
  - Fixing or improving documentation.

    permissions:
      pull-requests: read
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: docker://agilepathway/pull-request-label-checker:latest
        with:
          one_of: breaking,security,feature,bug,refactor,upgrade,docs,lang-all,internal

            this.fessProps = fessProps;
            return this;
        }

        /**
         * Sets the bug report properties.
         * @param bugReportProps The bug report properties.
         * @return This ApiSystemInfoResponse instance.
         */
        public ApiSystemInfoResponse bugReportProps(final List<Map<String, String>> bugReportProps) {

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

E assim deve ser porque seria um bug no seu código ter o `ValidationError` do Pydantic na sua *response*, ou em qualquer outro lugar do seu código (que não na requisição do cliente).