byte[] encrypted = encryptCredentials(plaintext);
        return Base64.getEncoder().encodeToString(encrypted);
    }

    /**
     * Decrypt credentials from a base64 string
     *
     * @param encryptedString base64 encoded encrypted credentials
     * @return decrypted credentials
     * @throws GeneralSecurityException if decryption fails
     */

    void testParseURL_RelativeSpecWithEmptyHost() throws MalformedURLException {
        // Arrange: base URL with empty host
        Handler handler = newHandler();
        URL base = new URL(null, "smb://", handler);

        // Act: relative path should exercise the 'else if' path in parseURL
        URL rel = new URL(base, "foo/bar", handler);

        // Assert

  }

  @Override
  public void write(byte[] bytes, int off, int len) throws IOException {
    hasher.putBytes(bytes, off, len);
    out.write(bytes, off, len);
  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@link HashCode} based on the data written to this stream. The result is
   * unspecified if this method is called more than once on the same instance.
   */
  public HashCode hash() {
    return hasher.hash();
  }

// are equal. The signatures are expected to be base64 encoded strings
// according to the AWS S3 signature V2 spec.
func compareSignatureV2(sig1, sig2 string) bool {
	// Decode signature string to binary byte-sequence representation is required
	// as Base64 encoding of a value is not unique:
	// For example "aGVsbG8=" and "aGVsbG8=\r" will result in the same byte slice.
	signature1, err := base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString(sig1)
	if err != nil {

package com.google.common.cache;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Futures.immediateFuture;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.common.base.Function;
import com.google.common.base.Supplier;

    This PR fixes a security issue where an IAM user based
    on his policy is granted more privileges than restricted
    by the users IAM policy.

    This is due to an issue of prefix based Matcher() function
    which was incorrectly matching prefix based on resource
    prefixes instead of exact match.
```

      <codeSegments>
        <codeSegment>
          <version>1.2.0+</version>
          <comment>Generated hashCode() and equals() based on identifier also calls its super, which breaks comparison
          </comment>
          <code>
            <![CDATA[
    /**
     * Computes a hash value based on {@link #getType()} and {@link #getProvides()} values.
     */
    public int hashCode() {

    @Resource
    protected FessLoginAssist fessLoginAssist;

    /** Fess configuration for system settings */
    @Resource
    protected FessConfig fessConfig;

    /**
     * Retrieves a paginated list of users based on the provided pager criteria.
     * Updates the pager with pagination information including total count and page navigation.
     *
     * @param userPager the pager containing search criteria and pagination settings

        });
        return asHtml(path_AdminElevateword_AdminElevatewordJsp).renderWith(data -> {
            searchPaging(data, form);
        });
    }

    /**
     * Searches elevate words based on form criteria.
     *
     * @param form search form containing search parameters
     * @return HTML response with filtered elevate word list
     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE, ROLE + VIEW })

            logger.debug("Thumbnail generator is not found: {}", docMap != null ? docMap.get("url") : docMap);
        }
        return false;
    }

    /**
     * Gets the image filename for a document based on its document map.
     *
     * @param docMap the document data map
     * @return the generated image filename
     */
    protected String getImageFilename(final Map<String, Object> docMap) {