* parameters, and as it turns out Firefox and Chrome actually do rather different things, and
     * both say in their comments that they're not really sure what the right approach is. We go
     * with Chrome's behavior (which also experimentally seems to match what IE does), but if you
     * actually want to have a good chance of things working, please avoid double-quotes, newlines,

   *   <li>have equal funnels
   * </ul>
   *
   * @param that The Bloom filter to check for compatibility.
   * @since 15.0
   */
  public boolean isCompatible(BloomFilter<T> that) {
    checkNotNull(that);
    return this != that
        && this.numHashFunctions == that.numHashFunctions
        && this.bitSize() == that.bitSize()
        && this.strategy.equals(that.strategy)
        && this.funnel.equals(that.funnel);
  }

 * stores information-per-URL will need to either canonicalize manually, or suffer unnecessary
 * redundancy for such URLs.
 *
 * Because they don't attempt canonical form, these classes are surprisingly difficult to use
 * securely. Suppose you're building a webservice that checks that incoming paths are prefixed

  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;

    // call get() twice to make sure that memoization doesn't interfere
    // with throwing the exception
    for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
      try {
        memoizedSupplier.get();
        fail("failed to throw NullPointerException");
      } catch (NullPointerException e) {
        // this is what should happen
      }
    }
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible

        assertWithMessage("roundToDouble(" + input + ", " + mode + ")")
            .that(BigIntegerMath.roundToDouble(input, mode))
            .isEqualTo(expectation);
      }

      if (!expectedValues.containsKey(UNNECESSARY)) {
        assertWithMessage("Expected roundUnnecessaryShouldThrow call")
            .that(unnecessaryShouldThrow)
            .isTrue();
        assertThrows(

   * has not added {@link AnnotatedType}. That means that we cannot implement that interface in
   * source code in a way that will compile on both Java and Android. If we include the {@code
   * getAnnotatedBounds()} method, then its return type means it won't compile on Android, while if
   * we don't include the method, then the compiler will complain that an abstract method is

import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests relating to cache eviction: what does and doesn't count toward maximumSize, what happens
 * when maximumSize is reached, etc.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class CacheEvictionTest extends TestCase {
  static final int MAX_SIZE = 100;

        return true;
      }
      if (object instanceof ShortArrayAsList) {
        ShortArrayAsList that = (ShortArrayAsList) object;
        int size = size();
        if (that.size() != size) {
          return false;
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
          if (array[start + i] != that.array[that.start + i]) {
            return false;
          }
        }
        return true;
      }

        return true;
      }
      if (object instanceof ShortArrayAsList) {
        ShortArrayAsList that = (ShortArrayAsList) object;
        int size = size();
        if (that.size() != size) {
          return false;
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
          if (array[start + i] != that.array[that.start + i]) {
            return false;
          }
        }
        return true;
      }