import jcifs.smb.SmbException;

@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class LsaPolicyHandleTest {

    @Mock
    private DcerpcHandle mockDcerpcHandle;

    // Mocking MsrpcLsarOpenPolicy2 and MsrpcLsarClose is tricky because they are created inside the constructor/method.
    // We need to use ArgumentCaptor or a custom Answer to control their behavior.
    // For now, let's assume we can mock their behavior through the sendrecv method of DcerpcHandle.

   * lost, because the signal may be sent to a condition whose sole waiter has just been
   * interrupted.
   *
   * Imagine a monitor with multiple guards. A thread enters the monitor, satisfies all the guards,
   * and leaves, calling signalNextWaiter. With traditional locks and conditions, all the conditions

    setDefault(Double.class, 1D);
    setDefault(Class.class, Class.class);
  }

  /**
   * Sets the default value for {@code type}. The default value isn't used in testing {@link
   * Object#equals} because more than one sample instances are needed for testing inequality. To set
   * distinct values for equality testing, use {@link #setDistinctValues} instead.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

   * <pre>
   * collection.add(existingElement);
   * expectAdded(existingElement);</pre>
   *
   * <p>In this case, {@code collection} was not modified as a result of the {@code add()} call, and
   * the test will fail because the number of occurrences of {@code existingElement} is unchanged.
   *
   * @param elements expected additional contents of {@link #container}
   */
  protected final void expectAdded(E... elements) {

 * family. <b>Avoid</b> creating a mock or stub {@code Future}. Mock and stub implementations are
 * fragile because they assume that only certain methods will be called and because they often
 * implement subtleties of the API improperly.
 *
 * <p><b>Custom implementation</b>: Avoid implementing {@code ListenableFuture} from scratch. If you

 * family. <b>Avoid</b> creating a mock or stub {@code Future}. Mock and stub implementations are
 * fragile because they assume that only certain methods will be called and because they often
 * implement subtleties of the API improperly.
 *
 * <p><b>Custom implementation</b>: Avoid implementing {@code ListenableFuture} from scratch. If you

        }
      }
      return true;
    }
  },
  /**
   * This strategy uses all 128 bits of {@link Hashing#murmur3_128} when hashing. It looks different
   * from the implementation in MURMUR128_MITZ_32 because we're avoiding the multiplication in the
   * loop and doing a (much simpler) += hash2. We're also changing the index to a positive number by
   * AND'ing with Long.MAX_VALUE instead of flipping the bits.
   */

 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableList.get} returns {@code E}, but that value is never {@code null}. (Accordingly,

 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableList.get} returns {@code E}, but that value is never {@code null}. (Accordingly,

        });

        // Check that the root cause is CIFSException
        assertTrue(exception instanceof java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException);
        Throwable cause = ((java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException) exception).getCause();
        assertTrue(cause instanceof CIFSException);
        assertTrue(cause.getMessage().contains("Failed to create multi-channel transport"));
    }

    @Test