@Test
    public void test_implementsInterface() {
        assertTrue(invokerAssistant instanceof InvokerAssistant);
    }

    // Test multiple calls to the same method return consistent results
    @Test
    public void test_methodConsistency() {
        // Test assistClientInvokeNames consistency
        String[] names1 = invokerAssistant.assistClientInvokeNames();

    attributes:
      label: 2. What's the best code you can write to accomplish that without the new feature?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 3. What would that same code look like if we added your feature?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >

/// info

自 FastAPI `0.102.0` 起新增 `separate_input_output_schemas` 的支援。🤓

///

{* ../../docs_src/separate_openapi_schemas/tutorial002_py310.py hl[10] *}

### 文件中輸入與輸出使用相同結構描述的模型 { #same-schema-for-input-and-output-models-in-docs }

此時輸入與輸出將共用同一個模型結構描述，只有 `Item`，其中 `description` 不是必填：

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image05.png">

/// info | 信息

对 `separate_input_output_schemas` 的支持是在 FastAPI `0.102.0` 中添加的。🤓

///

{* ../../docs_src/separate_openapi_schemas/tutorial002_py310.py hl[10] *}

### 文档中输入/输出使用同一 Schema 的模型 { #same-schema-for-input-and-output-models-in-docs }

现在该模型的输入和输出将只使用一个 schema，即 `Item`，并且其中的 `description` **不是必填**：

<div class="screenshot">
<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image05.png">

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.CanIgnoreReturnValue;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Static convenience methods that serve the same purpose as Java language <a
 * href="https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/language/assert.html">assertions</a>,
 * except that they are always enabled. These methods should be used instead of Java assertions

        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyOf_array_empty() {
    /*
     * We don't guarantee the same-as property, so we aren't obligated to test it. However, it's
     * useful in testing - when two things are the same then one can't have bugs the other doesn't.
     */
    assertThat(ImmutableDoubleArray.copyOf(new double[0]))
        .isSameInstanceAs(ImmutableDoubleArray.of());

  }

  /**
   * Constructs a {@code LinkedHashMultimap} with the same mappings as the specified multimap. If a
   * key-value mapping appears multiple times in the input multimap, it only appears once in the
   * constructed multimap. The new multimap has the same {@link Multimap#entries()} iteration order
   * as the input multimap, except for excluding duplicate mappings.
   *

  }

  /**
   * Constructs a {@code LinkedHashMultimap} with the same mappings as the specified multimap. If a
   * key-value mapping appears multiple times in the input multimap, it only appears once in the
   * constructed multimap. The new multimap has the same {@link Multimap#entries()} iteration order
   * as the input multimap, except for excluding duplicate mappings.
   *

## Повернути ті самі вхідні дані { #return-the-same-input-data }

Тут ми оголошуємо модель `UserIn`, вона міститиме пароль у відкритому вигляді:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[7,9] *}

/// info | Інформація

## Вернуть те же входные данные { #return-the-same-input-data }

Здесь мы объявляем модель `UserIn`, она будет содержать пароль в открытом виде:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[7,9] *}

/// info | Информация