* Allow configuration of a single security group for ELBs ([#45500](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/45500), [@nbutton23](https://github.com/nbutton23))

  * Fix support running the master with a different AWS account or even on a different cloud provider than the nodes. ([#44235](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/44235), [@mrIncompetent](https://github.com/mrIncompetent))

   * 0x1213141516171819L} would yield the byte array {@code {0x12, 0x13, 0x14, 0x15, 0x16, 0x17,
   * 0x18, 0x19}}.
   *
   * <p>If you need to convert and concatenate several values (possibly even of different types),
   * use a shared {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer} instance, or use {@link
   * com.google.common.io.ByteStreams#newDataOutput()} to get a growable buffer.
   */
  public static byte[] toByteArray(long value) {

			accessKey:          credentials.AccessKey,
			secretKey:          credentials.SecretKey,
			expectedRespStatus: http.StatusBadRequest,
		},
		// Test case - 7.
		// Different bucket name used in the HTTP request and the policy string.
		// checkBucketPolicyResources should fail.
		{
			bucketName:         bucketName1,

///

### <a href="https://requests.readthedocs.io" class="external-link" target="_blank">Requests</a>

**FastAPI** n'est pas réellement une alternative à **Requests**. Leur cadre est très différent.

Il serait en fait plus courant d'utiliser Requests _à l'intérieur_ d'une application FastAPI.

Mais quand même, FastAPI s'est inspiré de Requests.

     * field should be used for calculating that. This would likely be zero
     * but an implemantation that encorporates the transport header(for
     * efficiency) might use a different initial bufferIndex. For example,
     * to eliminate copying data when writing NbtSession data one might
     * manage that 4 byte header specifically and therefore the initial

				agree++
				continue
			}
			// If only the name matches we didn't agree, but add it for resolution.
			if entry.name == current.name {
				topEntries[i] = entry
				continue
			}
			// We got different entries
			if entry.name > current.name {
				continue
			}
			// We got a new, better current.
			// Clear existing entries.
			for i := range topEntries[:i] {
				topEntries[i] = metaCacheEntry{}

- Kubelet: the HostPort implementation in dockershim was not taking into consideration the HostIP field, causing that the same HostPort can not be used with different IP addresses.
  This bug causes the conformance test "HostPort validates that there is no conflict between pods with same hostPort but different hostIP and protocol" to fail. ([#98838](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/98838), [@aojea](https://github.com/aojea)) [SIG Network and Node]

   *
   * <p>For more on IPv4 compatible addresses see section 2.5.5.1 of <a target="_parent"
   * href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.5.5.1">RFC 4291</a>.
   *
   * <p>NOTE: This method is different from {@link Inet6Address#isIPv4CompatibleAddress} in that it
   * more correctly classifies {@code "::"} and {@code "::1"} as proper IPv6 addresses (which they

 *
 * <pre>
 * LockA -&gt; LockB -&gt; LockC
 * LockA -&gt; LockC -&gt; LockB
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p><strong>ReadWriteLocks</strong>
 *
 * <p>While {@code ReadWriteLock} instances have different properties and can form cycles without
 * potential deadlock, this class treats {@code ReadWriteLock} instances as equivalent to
 * traditional exclusive locks. Although this increases the false positives that the locks detect

      .assertCode(200)
      .assertBody("A")
    val request1ReceivedAt = System.currentTimeMillis()
    assertThat(server.takeRequest().headers["If-None-Match"]).isNull()

    // Hit that stored response. It's different, but Vary says it doesn't matter.
    Thread.sleep(10) // Make sure the timestamps are unique.
    val cacheHit =
      executeSynchronously(
        "/",
        "Accept-Language",
        "en-US",