if (value < 0) {
      bigInt = bigInt.setBit(Long.SIZE - 1);
    }
    return bigInt;
  }

  @Override
  public int compareTo(UnsignedLong o) {
    checkNotNull(o);
    return UnsignedLongs.compare(value, o.value);
  }

  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    return Longs.hashCode(value);
  }

  @Override
  public boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object obj) {

To send data, you should use one of: `POST` (the more common), `PUT`, `DELETE` or `PATCH`.

Sending a body with a `GET` request has an undefined behavior in the specifications, nevertheless, it is supported by FastAPI, only for very complex/extreme use cases.

As it is discouraged, the interactive docs with Swagger UI won't show the documentation for the body when using `GET`, and proxies in the middle might not support it.

///

pkg bytes, func ContainsFunc([]uint8, func(int32) bool) bool #54386
pkg bytes, method (*Buffer) AvailableBuffer() []uint8 #53685
pkg bytes, method (*Buffer) Available() int #53685
pkg cmp, func Compare[$0 Ordered]($0, $0) int #59488
pkg cmp, func Less[$0 Ordered]($0, $0) bool #59488
pkg cmp, type Ordered interface {} #59488
pkg context, func AfterFunc(Context, func()) func() bool #57928

  }

  // 'test' to demonstrate some potentially ambiguous overloads.  This 'test' is kind of strange,
  // but essentially each line will be a call to a Preconditions method that, but for a documented
  // change would be a compiler error.
  // See http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.12.2 for the spec on
  // how javac selects overloads
  @SuppressWarnings("null")
  public void overloadSelection() {

  }

  public void testValueSetHashTableExpansion() {
    LinkedHashMultimap<String, Integer> multimap = LinkedHashMultimap.create();
    for (int z = 1; z <= 100; z++) {
      multimap.put("a", z);
      // The Eclipse compiler (and hence GWT) rejects a parameterized cast.
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
      LinkedHashMultimap<String, Integer>.ValueSet valueSet =
          (LinkedHashMultimap.ValueSet) multimap.backingMap().get("a");

#   your builds. This usually saves a lot of time, especially when
#   re-running tests. However, note that:
#
#    - New environments like new CUDA versions, changes to manylinux,
#      compilers, etc. can cause undefined behavior such as build failures
#      or tests passing incorrectly.
#    - Automatic LLVM updates are known to extend build time even with
#      the cache; this is unavoidable.

        case 128:
          *tf_dtype = TF_DataType::TF_COMPLEX128;
          return absl::OkStatus();
        default:
          return tensorflow::errors::InvalidArgument(
              "Unsupported Complex bits: ", dtype.bits);
      }
      break;
    default:
      return tensorflow::errors::InvalidArgument("Unsupported Type Codes: ",
                                                 dtype.code);
  }
}

      return -1;
    }
    int result = Range.compareOrThrow(endpoint, that.endpoint);
    if (result != 0) {
      return result;
    }
    // same value. below comes before above
    return Boolean.compare(this instanceof AboveValue, that instanceof AboveValue);
  }

  C endpoint() {
    return endpoint;
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // catching CCE
  @Override

         * just one problem: Starting with JDK 7u51, the JDK TypeVariable's equals() method doesn't
         * recognize instances of our TypeVariable implementation. This is a problem because users
         * compare TypeVariables from the JDK against TypeVariables returned by TypeResolver. To
         * work with all JDK versions, TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable
         * implementation in each of the three possible cases:

      for (Cell<? extends R, ? extends C, ? extends V> cell : table.cellSet()) {
        put(cell);
      }
      return this;
    }

    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    Builder<R, C, V> combine(Builder<R, C, V> other) {
      this.cells.addAll(other.cells);
      return this;
    }

    /**
     * Returns a newly-created immutable table.
     *