<c:if test="${editable}">
                                        <la:form action="/admin/crawlinginfo/">
                                            <div class="col-sm-12 center">
                                                <button type="button" class="btn btn-danger"
                                                        data-toggle="modal" data-target="#confirmToDeleteAll">

          CharStreams.copy(reader, sb);
        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this

 *
 * <p>The {@link #count} and {@link #size} implementations all iterate across the set returned by
 * {@link Multiset#entrySet()}, as do many methods acting on the set returned by {@link
 * #elementSet()}. Override those methods for better performance.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
abstract class AbstractMultiset<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractCollection<E>
    implements Multiset<E> {

          CharStreams.copy(reader, sb);
        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this

In einigen Fällen müssen Sie möglicherweise immer noch Pydantics Version von `dataclasses` verwenden. Zum Beispiel, wenn Sie Fehler in der automatisch generierten API-Dokumentation haben.

In diesem Fall können Sie einfach die Standard-`dataclasses` durch `pydantic.dataclasses` ersetzen, was einen direkten Ersatz darstellt:

  }

  /**
   * Not supported. Use {@link #naturalOrder}, which offers better type-safety, instead. This method
   * exists only to hide {@link ImmutableMap#builder} from consumers of {@code ImmutableSortedMap}.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated Use {@link ImmutableSortedMap#naturalOrder}, which offers better type-safety.
   */
  @DoNotCall("Use naturalOrder")
  @Deprecated

        bool((must, should, mustNot, filter) -> {
            filteredLambda.callback(must, filter);
        }, opLambda);
    }

    public void not(OperatorCall<DuplicateHostCQ> notLambda) {
        not(notLambda, null);
    }

    public void not(final OperatorCall<DuplicateHostCQ> notLambda, final ConditionOptionCall<BoolQueryBuilder> opLambda) {
        bool((must, should, mustNot, filter) -> notLambda.callback(mustNot), opLambda);

        bool((must, should, mustNot, filter) -> {
            filteredLambda.callback(must, filter);
        }, opLambda);
    }

    public void not(OperatorCall<FailureUrlCQ> notLambda) {
        not(notLambda, null);
    }

    public void not(final OperatorCall<FailureUrlCQ> notLambda, final ConditionOptionCall<BoolQueryBuilder> opLambda) {
        bool((must, should, mustNot, filter) -> notLambda.callback(mustNot), opLambda);

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): if we start to override indexOf/lastIndexOf under GWT, we'll want some way to
   * override subList to return an ImmutableSortedAsList for better performance. Right now, I'm not
   * sure there's any performance hit from our failure to override subListUnchecked under GWT
   */
  @Override
  ImmutableList<E> subListUnchecked(int fromIndex, int toIndex) {

			</div>

			<div class="row justify-content-center">
				<div class="col-auto">
					<button type="submit" name="search" id="searchButton"
						class="btn btn-primary mx-auto">
						<i class="fa fa-search" aria-hidden="true"></i>
						<la:message key="labels.index_form_search_btn" />
					</button>
				</div>
			</div>
		</main>
		<jsp:include page="footer.jsp" />
	</la:form>