ASGI compatible avec HTTP/2 et Trio entre autres fonctionnalités.
* <a href="https://github.com/django/daphne" class="external-link" target="_blank">Daphne</a> : le serveur ASGI
  conçu pour Django Channels.

## Machine serveur et programme serveur

Il y a un petit détail sur les noms à garder à l'esprit. 💡

		cacheStore:       cacheStore,
		namer:            namer,
		initialized:      make(chan struct{}),
	}
	// When the schema initialization is completed, the channel will be closed
	defer close(schema.initialized)

	// Load exist schema cache, return if exists
	if v, ok := cacheStore.Load(schemaCacheKey); ok {
		s := v.(*Schema)

import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * @author Charles Fry
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class LocalLoadingCacheTest extends TestCase {

  private static <K, V> LocalLoadingCache<K, V> makeCache(
      CacheBuilder<K, V> builder, CacheLoader<? super K, V> loader) {

# ----------------------------------------------------------
# Application Exception
# ---------------------
# /- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# five framework-embedded messages (don't change key names)
# - - - - - - - - - -/
errors.login.failure = Anmeldung fehlgeschlagen.
errors.app.illegal.transition = Ungültiger Übergang. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

   * processing and may run concurrently, for example, if the JVM flag {@code
   * -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent} is used.
   *
   * <p>Whenever possible, it is preferable to test directly for some observable change resulting
   * from GC, as with {@link #awaitClear}. Because there are no guarantees for the order of GC
   * finalization processing, there may still be some unfinished work for the GC to do after this
   * method returns.

     * to be the case). Thus, this test is more of a regression test.
     *
     * Rough instructions to regenerate the test outputs and verify correctness:
     * - Temporarily change this test:
     * --- Comment out assertEquals.
     * --- System.out.println(input + " " + simplifyPath(input));
     * --- fail(). (If the test were to pass, its output would be hidden.)
     * - Run the test.

   * array is "safe" in that no references to it are maintained by the collection. The caller is
   * thus free to modify the returned array.
   *
   * <p>This method assumes that the collection size doesn't change while the method is running.
   *
   * <p>TODO(kevinb): support concurrently modified collections?
   *
   * @param c the collection for which to return an array of elements
   */

# ----------------------------------------------------------
# Application Exception
# ---------------------
# /- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# five framework-embedded messages (don't change key names)
# - - - - - - - - - -/
errors.login.failure = Error de inicio de sesión.
errors.app.illegal.transition = Transición ilegal. Por favor, inténtelo de nuevo.

      return null;
    } else {
      Range<K> range = ranges.get(index);
      return range.contains(key) ? immutableEntry(range, values.get(index)) : null;
    }
  }

  @Override
  public Range<K> span() {
    if (ranges.isEmpty()) {
      throw new NoSuchElementException();
    }
    Range<K> firstRange = ranges.get(0);
    Range<K> lastRange = ranges.get(ranges.size() - 1);

                                && !artifact.getDependencyFilter().include(artifact)) {
                            return null;
                        }

                        // MNG-2861: the artifact data has changed. If the available versions where previously
                        // retrieved, we need to update it.
                        // TODO shouldn't the versions be merged across relocations?