does not guarantee they will be satisfied. Both the “hard” and “soft” variants
of node affinity use the new syntax. Documentation is [here](http://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/node-selection/) (see section “Alpha feature in Kubernetes v1.2: Node Affinity“). Design doc is [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.2/docs/design/nodeaffinity.md).

* fix: detach azure disk issue using dangling error ([#81266](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/81266), [@andyzhangx](https://github.com/andyzhangx))
* Fixed a bug in the CSI metrics that does not return not supported error when a CSI driver does not support metrics. ([#79851](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/79851), [@jparklab](https://github.com/jparklab))

///

## Motivation { #motivation }

Let's start with a simple example:

{* ../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial001.py *}

Calling this program outputs:

```
John Doe
```

The function does the following:

* Takes a `first_name` and `last_name`.
* Converts the first letter of each one to upper case with `title()`.

	streamingContentEncoding      = "aws-chunked"
	awsTrailerHeader              = "X-Amz-Trailer"
	trailerKVSeparator            = ":"
)

// getChunkSignature - get chunk signature.
// Does not update anything in cr.
func (cr *s3ChunkedReader) getChunkSignature() string {
	hashedChunk := hex.EncodeToString(cr.chunkSHA256Writer.Sum(nil))

	// Calculate string to sign.
	alg := signV4ChunkedAlgorithm + "\n"

Но внутреннее устройство **конкурентности** и **параллелизма** довольно разное.

Чтобы это понять, представьте такую картину:

### Конкурентные бургеры

<!-- The gender neutral cook emoji "🧑‍🍳" does not render well in browsers. In the meantime, I'm using a mix of male "👨‍🍳" and female "👩‍🍳" cooks. -->

	for i := range totalParts {
		// hard coding hash and algo value for the checksum, Since we are benchmarking the parsing of xl.meta the magnitude doesn't affect the test,
		// The magnitude doesn't make a difference, only the size does.
		xlMeta.AddTestObjectCheckSum(i+1, BLAKE2b512, "a23f5eff248c4372badd9f3b2455a285cd4ca86c3d9a570b091d3fc5cd7ca6d9484bbea3f8c5d8d4f84daae96874419eda578fd736455334afbac2c924b3915a")
		xlMeta.AddTestObjectPart(i+1, 67108864)
	}

        this.settings = settings;
        analyzerSettingsIndexName = createAnalyzerSettingsIndexName(settingsIndexName);
    }

    /**
     * Initializes the analyzer settings.
     * If the analyzer settings index does not exist, it creates it with default settings and mappings.
     * It also loads analyzer names and field analyzer mappings.
     */
    public synchronized void init() {
        try {

   * written in the order they were enqueued.
   *
   * If a frame cannot be sent - because there are none enqueued or because the web socket is not
   * connected - this does nothing and returns false. Otherwise, this returns true and the caller
   * should immediately invoke this method again until it returns false.
   *

            throws ArtifactResolutionException {
        fireEvent(ResolutionListener.TEST_ARTIFACT, listeners, node);

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {

   *
   * @param arrays zero or more {@code char} arrays
   * @return a single array containing all the values from the source arrays, in order
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the total number of elements in {@code arrays} does not fit
   *     in an {@code int}
   */
  public static char[] concat(char[]... arrays) {
    long length = 0;
    for (char[] array : arrays) {
      length += array.length;
    }