}

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

                                        Type2Message.UNI_ENCODING);
                        assertNotNull(serverName);
                        // The actual server name might be different from TEST_HOSTNAME based on how getHostName() works
                    }
                }

            } catch (Exception e) {
                fail("Failed to invoke makeTargetInfo via reflection: " + e.getMessage());

rem, #{divide($value, $rfs-rem-value)}rem, #{$value}px);\n        }\n        @else {\n          // Calculate the minimum value\n          $value-min: $rfs-base-value + divide(abs($value) - $rfs-base-value, $rfs-factor);\n\n          // Calculate difference between $value and the minimum value\n          $value-diff: abs($value) - $value-min;\n\n          // Base value formatting\n          $min-width: if($rfs-unit == rem, #{divide($value-min, $rfs-rem-value)}rem, #{$value-min}px);\n\n          //...

   *   may add headers like `User-Agent`.
   * * It may be the request generated in response to an HTTP redirect or authentication
   *   challenge. In this case the request URL may be different than the initial request URL.
   *
   * Use the `request` of the [networkResponse] field to get the wire-level request that was
   * transmitted. In the case of follow-ups and redirects, also look at the `request` of the

   * <p>The {@link Table#cellSet()} iteration order of the provided table determines the iteration
   * ordering of all views in the returned table. Note that some views of the original table and the
   * copied table may have different iteration orders. For more control over the ordering, create a
   * {@link Builder} and call {@link Builder#orderRowsBy}, {@link Builder#orderColumnsBy}, and
   * {@link Builder#putAll}
   *

        Secured secured = MultipleRolesClass.class.getAnnotation(Secured.class);
        String[] roles1 = secured.value();
        String[] roles2 = secured.value();

        // Different array instances should be returned
        assertNotSame(roles1, roles2);

        // But values should be the same
        assertEquals(roles1.length, roles2.length);
        for (int i = 0; i < roles1.length; i++) {

          file = null
        }
      }

      fileToClose?.closeQuietly()
    }
  }

  companion object {
    // TODO(jwilson): what to do about timeouts? They could be different and unfortunately when any
    //     timeout is hit we like to tear down the whole stream.

    private const val SOURCE_UPSTREAM = 1
    private const val SOURCE_FILE = 2

      return;
    }
    fail("Should get not equal to equal object error");
  }

  /**
   * Test for an invalid hashCode method, i.e., one that returns different value for objects that
   * are equal according to the equals method
   */
  public void testInvalidHashCode() {
    Object a = new InvalidHashCodeObject(1, 2);
    Object b = new InvalidHashCodeObject(1, 2);

import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Base class for tests for emulated {@link AbstractFuture} that allow subclasses to swap in a
 * different "source Future" for {@link AbstractFuture#setFuture} calls.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullUnmarked
abstract class AbstractAbstractFutureTest extends TestCase {
  private TestedFuture<Integer> future;