private static final class LegacyAsyncDispatcher extends Dispatcher {

    // This dispatcher matches the original dispatch behavior of AsyncEventBus.
    //
    // We can't really make any guarantees about the overall dispatch order for this dispatcher in
    // a multithreaded environment for a couple of reasons:
    //

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@IgnoreJRERequirement // We opt into library desugaring for our tests.
public class CollectionStreamTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  /*
   * We're not really testing the implementation of Stream, only that we're getting a Stream
   * that corresponds to the expected elements.
   */

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = KNOWN_ORDER)
  public void testStreamToArrayUnknownOrder() {

import java.time.temporal.ChronoField.NANO_OF_SECOND
import java.time.temporal.ChronoField.SECOND_OF_MINUTE
import java.util.logging.Formatter
import java.util.logging.LogRecord

/**
 * Is Java8 Data and Time really this bad, or is writing this on a plane from just javadocs a bad
 * idea?
 *
 * Why so much construction?
 */
class OneLineLogFormat : Formatter() {
  private val d =
    DateTimeFormatterBuilder()

            logger.warn("The metadata {} {}{}", metadata, errorType, msg);
        }
    }

    @Override
    public void artifactDescriptorInvalid(RepositoryEvent event) {
        // The exception stack trace is not really interesting here
        logger.warn(
                "The POM for {} is invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available: {}",
                event.getArtifact(),

// See: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/nf-winbase-dosdatetimetofiletime
func msDosTimeToTime(dosDate, dosTime uint16) time.Time {
	return time.Date(
		// date bits 0-4: day of month; 5-8: month; 9-15: years since 1980
		int(dosDate>>9+1980),
		time.Month(dosDate>>5&0xf),
		int(dosDate&0x1f),

		// time bits 0-4: second/2; 5-10: minute; 11-15: hour
		int(dosTime>>11),
		int(dosTime>>5&0x3f),

~~ under the License.

 -----
 Introduction
 -----
 Hervé Boutemy
 -----
 2009-04-26
 -----

Maven Repository Metadata Model

 This is strictly the model for Maven Repository Metadata, so really just plain objects.

 The metadata file name is:

 * <<<maven-metadata.xml>>> in a remote repository,

    # TODO: there might not be a current valid code path that uses this, it would
    # potentially enable query parameters defined as both a scalar and a list
    # but that would require more refactors, also not sure it's really useful
    from fastapi._compat import is_pv1_scalar_field

    field_info = FieldInfo()
    field = ModelField(
        name="foo",
        field_info=field_info,
        type_=Union[str, List[int]],

# Dependencies in path operation decorators

In some cases you don't really need the return value of a dependency inside your *path operation function*.

Or the dependency doesn't return a value.

But you still need it to be executed/solved.

For those cases, instead of declaring a *path operation function* parameter with `Depends`, you can add a `list` of `dependencies` to the *path operation decorator*.

            "/items",
            {"strange_header": "FastAPI test"},
            200,
            {"strange_header": "FastAPI test"},
        ),
        (
            "/items",
            {"strange-header": "Not really underscore"},
            200,
            {"strange_header": None},
        ),
    ],
)
def test(path, headers, expected_status, expected_response, client: TestClient):

// algorithms compute correct checksums. If any algorithm
// produces an incorrect checksum it fails with a hard error.
//
// bitrotSelfTest tries to catch any issue in the bitrot implementation
// early instead of silently corrupting data.
func bitrotSelfTest() {
	checksums := map[BitrotAlgorithm]string{
		SHA256:          "a7677ff19e0182e4d52e3a3db727804abc82a5818749336369552e54b838b004",