.containsExactly(0.0, 1.0, 3.0, 6.0, 10.0, 15.0, 21.0)
        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyOf_array_empty() {
    /*
     * We don't guarantee the same-as property, so we aren't obligated to test it. However, it's
     * useful in testing - when two things are the same then one can't have bugs the other doesn't.
     */
    assertThat(ImmutableDoubleArray.copyOf(new double[0]))
        .isSameInstanceAs(ImmutableDoubleArray.of());

SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

 *   <li><b>Shallow immutability.</b> Elements can never be added, removed or replaced in this
 *       collection. This is a stronger guarantee than that of {@link
 *       Collections#unmodifiableCollection}, whose contents change whenever the wrapped collection
 *       is modified.
 *   <li><b>Null-hostility.</b> This collection will never contain a null element.
 *   <li><b>Deterministic iteration.</b> The iteration order is always well-defined, depending on

    assertSame(CharMatcher.none(), CharMatcher.any().negate());

    assertSame(WHATEVER, CharMatcher.any().and(WHATEVER));
    assertSame(CharMatcher.any(), CharMatcher.any().or(WHATEVER));

    assertSame(CharMatcher.none(), CharMatcher.none().and(WHATEVER));
    assertSame(WHATEVER, CharMatcher.none().or(WHATEVER));
  }

  // The rest of the behavior of ANY and DEFAULT will be covered in the tests for

   *     of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null cause. At the moment, you
   *     can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit {@code null} cause. Note,
   *     however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents anyone from calling {@link
   *     #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a constructor that omits the
   *     cause.
   */
  @Deprecated

 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},
 * except that the method parameter must accept whatever condition-like object is passed into {@code
 * callAndAssertWaits} by the test.
 *
 * @param <L> the type of the lock-like object to be used
 * @author Justin T. Sampson
 */
@NullUnmarked

        .containsExactly(0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21)
        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyOf_array_empty() {
    /*
     * We don't guarantee the same-as property, so we aren't obligated to test it. However, it's
     * useful in testing - when two things are the same then one can't have bugs the other doesn't.
     */
    assertThat(ImmutableIntArray.copyOf(new int[0])).isSameInstanceAs(ImmutableIntArray.of());
  }

 *       cancelled, cancellation never propagates to a task that has started to run -- neither to
 *       the callable itself nor to any {@code Future} returned by an {@code AsyncCallable}.
 *       (However, cancellation can prevent an <i>unstarted</i> task from running.) Therefore, the
 *       next task will wait for any running callable (or pending {@code Future} returned by an

   * key set contains a key if and only if this multimap maps that key to at least one value.
   *
   * <p>Changes to the returned set will update the underlying multimap, and vice versa. However,
   * <i>adding</i> to the returned set is not possible.
   */
  Set<K> keySet();

  /**
   * Returns a view collection containing the key from each key-value pair in this multimap,

SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE