Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

* **Uvicorn**: ein ASGI-Server
    * **Starlette**: (verwendet Uvicorn) ein Web-Mikroframework

		return
	}

	// Analyze the heal token and route the request accordingly
	token, _, success := proxyRequestByToken(ctx, w, r, hip.clientToken, false)
	if success {
		return
	}
	hip.clientToken = token
	// if request was not successful, try this server locally if token
	// is not found the call will fail anyways. if token is empty
	// try this server to generate a new token.

	type healResp struct {

import java.util.concurrent.CyclicBarrier;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests for {@link Dispatcher} implementations.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class DispatcherTest extends TestCase {

  private final EventBus bus = new EventBus();

  private final IntegerSubscriber i1 = new IntegerSubscriber("i1");

      @Override
      public String toString() {
        return string;
      }
    };
  }

  @Generates
  Ticker generateTicker() {
    return new Ticker() {
      @Override
      public long read() {
        return 0;
      }

      final String string = paramString(Ticker.class, generateInt());

      @Override
      public String toString() {
        return string;
      }
    };

 * Generates tests of all methods on a {@code ByteSink} given various inputs written to it as well
 * as sub-suites for testing the {@code CharSink} view in the same way.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
@NullUnmarked
public class ByteSinkTester extends SourceSinkTester<ByteSink, byte[], ByteSinkFactory> {

 * Generates tests of all methods on a {@code ByteSink} given various inputs written to it as well
 * as sub-suites for testing the {@code CharSink} view in the same way.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
@NullUnmarked
public class ByteSinkTester extends SourceSinkTester<ByteSink, byte[], ByteSinkFactory> {

 *       typically implemented by opening a stream using one of the methods in the first category,
 *       doing something and finally closing the stream or channel that was opened.
 * </ul>
 *
 * @since 14.0
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
public abstract class ByteSink {

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ByteSink() {}

  /**

 *       typically implemented by opening a stream using one of the methods in the first category,
 *       doing something and finally closing the stream or channel that was opened.
 * </ul>
 *
 * @since 14.0
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
public abstract class ByteSink {

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ByteSink() {}

  /**

Ich habe seit mehreren Jahren APIs mit komplexen Anforderungen (maschinelles Lernen, verteilte Systeme, asynchrone Jobs, NoSQL-Datenbanken, usw.) erstellt und leitete mehrere Entwicklerteams.

Dabei musste ich viele Alternativen untersuchen, testen und nutzen.

Die Geschichte von **FastAPI** ist zu einem großen Teil die Geschichte seiner Vorgänger.

Wie im Abschnitt [Alternativen](alternatives.md){.internal-link target=_blank} gesagt:

<blockquote markdown="1">

	const fixedHdr = uint16(unsafe.Offsetof(syscall.Dirent{}.Name))
	nameBuf := (*[unsafe.Sizeof(dirent.Name)]byte)(unsafe.Pointer(&dirent.Name[0]))
	const nameBufLen = uint16(len(nameBuf))
	limit := dirent.Reclen - fixedHdr
	if limit > nameBufLen {
		limit = nameBufLen
	}
	// Avoid bugs in long file names
	// https://github.com/golang/tools/commit/5f9a5413737ba4b4f692214aebee582b47c8be74