void testIsTrustedDomain_DfsDisabled() throws SmbAuthException {
        // Scenario: DFS is disabled in the configuration.
        when(mockConfig.isDfsDisabled()).thenReturn(true);
        assertFalse(dfsImpl.isTrustedDomain(mockContext, "anydomain.com"));
    }

    @Test
    void testIsTrustedDomain_NoUserDomain() throws SmbAuthException {
        // Scenario: The user credentials do not specify a domain.

    deletion of the Node object, deletion of the instance in the cloud provider,
    or force deletion of the pod from the api-server).
    This helps prevent "split brain" scenarios in clustered applications by
    ensuring that unreachable pods will not be presumed dead unless some
    "fencing" operation has provided one of the above indications.

     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a2n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

[ {
  "scenario" : "org.gradle.performance.experiment.declarativedsl.DeclarativeDslFirstUsePerformanceTest.clean checkout",
  "durations" : [ {
    "testProject" : "largeEmptyMultiProjectDeclarativeDsl",
    "linux" : 468
  } ]
}, {
  "scenario" : "org.gradle.performance.experiment.declarativedsl.DeclarativeDslFirstUsePerformanceTest.cold daemon",
  "durations" : [ {
    "testProject" : "largeEmptyMultiProjectDeclarativeDsl",
    "linux" : 467
  } ]

                        "on ${os.asName()} (bucket $bucketIndex)",
                performanceSubProject = "performance",
                bucketIndex = bucketIndex,
                extraParameters =
                    "--profiler $profiler --tests \"${performanceScenario.scenario.className}.${performanceScenario.scenario.scenario}\"",

- DRA kubelet: Fixed the kubelet to also clean up `ResourceSlices` in some additional failure scenarios (driver was removed forcibly or crashed and did not restart). ([#132058](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/132058), [@pohly](https://github.com/pohly)) [SIG Node and Testing]

### Concorrência é melhor que paralelismo?

Não! Essa não é a moral da história.

Concorrência é diferente de paralelismo. E é melhor em cenários **específicos** que envolvam um monte de espera. Por isso, geralmente é muito melhor do que paralelismo para desenvolvimento de aplicações web. Mas não para tudo.

Então, para equilibrar tudo, imagine a seguinte historinha:

     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0

     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0