private static void testReverse(float[] input, float[] expectedOutput) {
    input = Arrays.copyOf(input, input.length);
    Floats.reverse(input);
    assertThat(input).isEqualTo(expectedOutput);
  }

  private static void testReverse(
      float[] input, int fromIndex, int toIndex, float[] expectedOutput) {
    input = Arrays.copyOf(input, input.length);
    Floats.reverse(input, fromIndex, toIndex);

    /*
     * TODO: cpovirk - Pre-size the HashMap based on the number of enum values? (But *not* based on
     * the number of entries in the map, as that makes it easy for hostile inputs to trigger lots of
     * allocation—not that any program should be deserializing hostile inputs to begin with!)
     */
    setDelegates(new EnumMap<K, V>(keyTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl), new HashMap<V, K>());
    Serialization.populateMap(this, stream);
  }

  public void testExtensiveWithAbsolutePrefix() throws IOException {
    // Inputs are /b/c/<every possible 10-character string of characters "a./">
    // Expected outputs are from realpath -s.
    doExtensiveTest("testdata/simplifypathwithabsoluteprefixtests.txt");
  }

  public void testExtensiveNoPrefix() throws IOException {
    /*
     * Inputs are <every possible 10-character string of characters "a./">
     *

  public void testExtensiveWithAbsolutePrefix() throws IOException {
    // Inputs are /b/c/<every possible 10-character string of characters "a./">
    // Expected outputs are from realpath -s.
    doExtensiveTest("testdata/simplifypathwithabsoluteprefixtests.txt");
  }

  public void testExtensiveNoPrefix() throws IOException {
    /*
     * Inputs are <every possible 10-character string of characters "a./">
     *

    return new FunctionForMapNoDefault<>(map);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a function which performs a map lookup with a default value. The function created by
   * this method returns {@code defaultValue} for all inputs that do not belong to the map's key
   * set. See also {@link #forMap(Map)}, which throws an exception in this case.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> you can just write the lambda expression {@code k ->

      const std::vector<TF_Tensor*>& input_tensors,
      const absl::optional<std::vector<int64_t>>& expected_shape) {
    // Create input_shapes.
    TF_ShapeAndTypeList* input_shapes =
        TF_NewShapeAndTypeList(input_shapes_vec.size());
    for (size_t i = 0; i < input_shapes_vec.size(); ++i) {
      const auto& input_shape = input_shapes_vec[i];

			description:       "Invalid command args - missing valid input spec",
			args:              strings.Split("entry configure --name foo -o temp --clusterID cid", " "),
			expectedException: true,
			expectedOutput:    "Error: expecting a WorkloadGroup artifact file or the name and namespace of an existing WorkloadGroup\n",
		},
		{
			description:       "Invalid command args - missing valid input spec",

     *
     * Unfortunately, we don't distinguish between these two cases in our public API: Joiner.on(...)
     * and Joiner.on(...).useForNull(...) both declare the same return type: plain Joiner. To ensure
     * that users *can* pass null arguments to Joiner, we annotate it as if it always tolerates null
     * inputs, rather than as if it never tolerates them.
     *

Anis Eleuch <******@****.***> 1712232280 +0100

//   - The inputs of the `op` are not used for shape inference. So, it is
//     OK to not have the inputs properly set in `op`. See `input_tensors`
//     if you want shape inference to consider the input tensors of the
//     op for shape inference.
//   - The types need not be set in `input_shapes` as it is not used.
//   - The number of `input_tensors` should be the same as the number of items