}

  /**
   * Creates a function that returns the same boolean output as the given predicate for all inputs.
   *
   * <p>The returned function is <i>consistent with equals</i> (as documented at {@link
   * Function#apply}) if and only if {@code predicate} is itself consistent with equals.
   *
   * <p>Prefer to use the method reference {@code predicate::test} instead. Note that it is not

        loadBalancer.setStrategy(LoadBalancingStrategy.AFFINITY_BASED);

        Smb2ReadRequest readRequest = mock(Smb2ReadRequest.class);
        when(readRequest.getTreeId()).thenReturn(123); // Set consistent tree ID for affinity

        when(mockChannelManager.getHealthyChannels()).thenReturn(Arrays.asList(channel1, channel2));

        // Multiple calls with same file ID should return same channel

   * without grabbing the lock.
   *
   * <p>To update this field correctly the lock must be held to guarantee that the state is
   * consistent.
   */
  private volatile StateSnapshot snapshot = new StateSnapshot(NEW);

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected AbstractService() {}

  /**

        @Test
        @DisplayName("getOpnum should be consistent across multiple calls")
        void testGetOpnumConsistency() {
            // When
            int opnum1 = bind.getOpnum();
            int opnum2 = bind.getOpnum();
            int opnum3 = bind.getOpnum();

            // Then
            assertEquals(opnum1, opnum2, "Opnum should be consistent");

            // from being reused. Otherwise we're still obligated to transmit the request body to
            // leave the connection in a consistent state.
            exchange.noNewExchangesOnConnection()
          }
        }
      } else if (!isUpgradeRequest) {
        exchange.noRequestBody()
      }

   *       traffic to {@code charlie}, rather than letting {@code bravo} keep its traffic.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>See the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_hashing">Wikipedia article on
   * consistent hashing</a> for more information.
   */
  public static int consistentHash(HashCode hashCode, int buckets) {
    return consistentHash(hashCode.padToLong(), buckets);
  }

  /**

        // Then
        assertEquals(0, bytesRead);
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 10, 50, 100, 200 })
    @DisplayName("Should write consistent structure at different offsets")
    void testWriteBytesAtDifferentOffsets(int offset) {
        // Given
        Configuration mockConfig = mock(Configuration.class);

       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for
       * consistency with how weak references are cleared). That's a behavior change -- arguably the
       * removal of a feature.
       *
       * Fortunately, exceptions rarely contain references to expensive resources.
       */

        assertEquals("parentdomain", testConfig.getDefaultDomain()); // Inherited
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should validate configuration consistency")
    void testConfigurationValidation() throws CIFSException {
        // Given
        Properties props = new Properties();
        props.setProperty("jcifs.smb.client.minVersion", "SMB311");

 * equality for both keys and values. This may not be the desired behavior for map implementations
 * that use non-standard notions of key equality, such as the entry of a {@code SortedMap} whose
 * comparator is not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman